About Me

Name: RedStateJD
Location: Rochester, NY
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Stand United, Because They Will!

What is amazing to me is how often people do NOT learn from history.  It can be recent or ancient, and they never learn.

A recent Rasmussen Poll says that a ‘Tea Party’ candidate beats Republicans in a national election, but still loose to the Democrats.  People are whipped up in a fury about the insane expansion of government and they are actually buying that a third party candidate could win.  Now lets think about what the poll said.  A Tea Party candidate could beat the Republican, but not the Democrat. 

Well, that’s all well and good if the Republican was the current incumbent and there was no such thing as a Democrat party.  Lets review some history.  In 1912, Teddy Roosevelt broke away from the Republicans to form the Progressive, or Bull Moose party.  The Republicans lost.  What was worse was that the Republican in the race, William Taft was already the incumbent.  It ushered in the beginning of the presidency of Woodrow Wilson, a progressive liberal democrat who supported such things as eugenics and isolationism.  Great.

Woodrow Wilson carried 40 states.  Teddy Roosevelt carried 6 states and Taft carried two.  As expected, many Republicans broke off to follow Roosevelt, but their numbers were two small, and it ushered in a 435 electoral-vote landslide for Wilson.

Lets zoom ahead to 1992, shall we?  Conservative independent (some said progressive, but his fiscal policies were very conservative) Ross Perot ran as an independent against the Incumbent Republican George H.W. Bush, and Democrat Bill Clinton.  Clinton won with a popular vote of over 44 million.  Bush won just over 39 million, and Perot clocked in with nearly 20 million votes.  Examine that carefully.  Twenty million votes could have gone to Bush and easily put him over the top.  Perot did not carry a single state, but he bled enough votes away for Clinton to march to victory.

Conservatives vote for the candidate that they believe is more conservative.  If that doesn’t fall on a major party line, so be it.  Liberals overwhelmingly vote for the Democrat candidate, because they know it will win.  You have socialist party and green party candidates who throw their hat into the ring, but they can never garner strong support.  None of them ever even came CLOSE to getting nearly 20 million votes!

We must come back to our senses people.  First of all, there is no ‘Tea Party.’  The Tea Party groups have a de facto political leader, and her name is Sarah Palin.  But if Sarah Palin ran as a member of a third party, I would not support her, despite how much I admire her.  I know that conservatives will divide our numbers, and the democrats will not.  This time around we do not even have the incumbent advantage.  It will be reminiscent of Reagan defeating Mondale, 49 to 1.

This is not what we want, and not what we need.  I have been to these tea parties.  I support them and find the people are all great people.  They have a great message.  Their fundamental flaw is that they would rather take down the whole system than hijack a party, just like the liberals did with the Democrats decades ago.  If Sarah Palin or Mitt Romney ran as a Republican, I think they would have a solid chance at beating President Obama.  You could run Jesus Christ as a third party candidate in this country and he would loose in a landslide. 

If we as conservatives ever hope to stop the Democrats, we need to unite.  The Republican party is not going anywhere, and only if it did would there be room for a third party, which of course would then be the new second party.  We must not divide our numbers.  We must stand united.  Trust me, they want a third party.  The Democrats in power would love to see a Tea Party organize and run against the Republicans, because they sure as heck would not be running against the Democrats.  It would be no contest.  Trust me, that bitter reality makes me sick. 

If Palin or Romney would enter the race head on, nothing would make me happier.  As a Republican with tea party support, they could probably do it.  The Democrats are not exactly on any favorite lists of Americans, save those in NYC or LA.  The biggest flaw the Republican Party is making, is not embracing these outsiders.  We’ve had enough of Gingrich, boys.  Bring in Sarah. 

United we can win it all.  If we divide our forces, we’ll end up dying by friendly fire. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What A Week It Has Been...

Before I really get rolling, I want to take a minute and talk about the horrific events at Ft. Hood that took place yesterday. 

I’ve always been a staunch supporter of the United States Military, and its personnel. I was coming home from work and saw it on the news when I walked in the house. It was one of the most disgusting displays of humanity that I had seen since September 11th. This man, Maj. Nidal Malik Hassan, did something deplorable. He was known to be politically against the war, and had spoken about how Muslims should not be made to fight other Muslims. He had had a recent past of poor performance reviews, and decided to take the coward’s way out.

Chanting “Allahu Akbar” (god is great) he turned his guns on his fellow soldiers. He killed 13 and wounded over thirty others. This country and it’s military gave him a chance, a life, and an education. Nearly half a million dollars I hear in that education too. It’s disgusting that this is how he chose to show himself. He ended up being a terrorist, a scumbag, and a disgrace to the uniform.

I want to say that my thoughts and prayers are with the men and women of Ft. Hood. I also want to say that I wish they had killed him when he was taken down.

Okay, now onto what I was originally had written, which deals with the election victories for the GOP this week.

I’ll admit I did a little bit of partying on behalf of the GOP victories.   After losing two straight elections, it was a pleasant surprise to see some life breathed back into the Republican brand. These were not RINO’s taking home the gold either. These people were running as Tax-cutting, small-government, traditional-valued conservatives.  

The State of Virginia was painted red across the board, as Republican Bob McDonnell beat out Democrat Creigh Deeds, 58% to 41%. To have a Republican win with a 17-point margin of victory in a state Obama won soundly last year is fantastic for the GOP brand. McDonnell is not the only one celebrating in Virginia today.   The Republican candidates for Lt. Governor and state Attorney General also won decisive victories. Three-for-three in ‘The Old Dominion State.’

Virginia showed quite a turnaround in exit polling from last year’s results. In polls conducted by Edison Research, we saw a dramatic change from last year. In 2008 the number of people who identified themselves as members of the GOP hug at about 33%. This year it topped 37%. During last year’s election, the number of self-described Democrats was at 39%. This year it is down to 33%. 

Creigh Deeds spent a decent amount of time trying to show that McDonnell’s conservative cred meant that he was oppressive towards women, but according to those polled, McDonnell took women 54% to 46%, and ‘working’ women even preferred him over Deeds 51% to 48%. 

The top issues in Virginia were the economy by 47%, health care by 24% and taxes by 15%. Conservatives and Republicans both showed up in greater numbers than in 2008, and it paid off. 

In New Jersey, it was nothing short of divine intervention. This is the bluest of blue states, and an incumbent Democrat governor should have sailed right through to victory. Christie in fact led the race for most of the past few months. Even with Obama coming multiple times to campaign for him, Corzine still lost, 48% to 44%. (Independent candidate Jim Daggett took the remainder of the vote) 

Independents made up twenty-five percent of the vote, and they favored Christie over Corzine, 60% to 30%. Members of the GOP voted solidly for Christie, 91% and 6% for Corzine. Registered Democrats were less loyal, going 88% for Corzine and 8% for Christie. Moderates for the most part were split, but still favored Christie, 48% to 45%. Conservatives, who were out in huge numbers in New Jersey, favored Christie by 88%.

The most important issues in New Jersey were the economy with 32%, Property Taxes (Highest in the nation) with 26%, corruption with 20@ and health care, 17%.  

In a brief note about the special election of New York’s 23rd district, all conservatives and Republicans can learn an important message here:

1)      1)  Pick conservative candidates, and not traitorous RINO’s who will either NOT champion liberal causes’ or betray their party by endorsing the Democratic candidate.

2)       2)  Learn whom in the party to trust more. Sorry Newt, but Palin’s endorsement won that round. Not only did her endorsement put Hoffman in the lead for a while, she proved to be a true force to be reckoned with. Hoffman nearly won as a third party conservative candidate in a blue state. People do like Sarah, and her endorsements. 

The elections also brought other surprises. The state of Maine became the 31st in a row to vote down Gay Marriage. Maine is no red state, and I was sure this was going to pass with popular vote. Barack Obama may have won in what was called an electoral landslide, but he did not win in an ideological one. Many people voted on their anger towards president Bush, which is just moronic. Ya know, because he wasn’t on the ticket! 

The United States is still a center-right nation. People may have voted in change last year, but it wasn’t what they thought it was going to be. This is only the beginning. They woke up the sleeping giant, and the conservatives are being led to the polls once again.  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Realize Who We Are Dealing With

Does anyone know the exchange rate for thirty pieces of silver?  I don't mean todays market price.  I was actually thinking of what it would have been worth around the year 33 AD.  Anyone know?  Only reason I ask is, I am curious to see if the final estimated amount ended up in either Senator Olympia Snowe's or Susan Collin's bank account recently.  I'm just asking!
We all know that politics is a dirty business.  It is not that far fetched to believe that two liberal-leaning republican senators could have been promised money to fund their pet-projects in order to give their vote to the health care bill.  Those two votes, if indeed they vote that way, cover for a few 'blue-dog' democrats that don't want to loose their jobs next election-cycle.  They give the comfort zone necessary to pass the bill, and the excuse for Obama and the congressional democrats to say this bill is passed with 'bipartisan support.' Sorry Mr. President, but two liberal republicans out the whole mess of them serving in congress currently is hardly bipartisan.  The military refit programs under President Reagan, an the Welfare Reform Acts under President Clinton would be far better examples.  While I identify with President Reagan much more than Clinton, I can at least respect Clinton for his pragmatism and his ability to look beyond his ideology.  When that man had his back against a wall, he knew when to bargain and when to shift.  Thats how someone who is a leader of a people gets things done.  You don't keep hitting your head against a brick wall, hoping the other side will give in.  We pay our leaders to work together, and sometimes that means bargaining and compromise.
President Obama is a different animal altogether.
I firmly believe that President Obama is willing to commit political suicide to pass health care reform.  While the numbers of support keep slipping, I have no doubt he will 'sacrifice himself' for the greater good.  By the way, anytime you hear leaders talking about the greater good, be prepared to hum the old Soviet anthem. 
I've said before that it takes a great amount of arrogant presumption to believe you know what is best for 300 million people.  Every leader wants to try and do what is best for their people, but they should never cross over into "I know what's better for you than you do."  Suggesting a good idea and winning over public support is one thing.  Ramming it down their throats when they say no is another thing entirely.  They have tried the moral argument.  They have tried the urgent one.
Soon it will be that they're going to make it very hard financially for your employers to not dump you onto the public option.  Then it will be mandatory 'volunteering' and community service.  Then it will be illegal to homeschool your children.  After all, how would they learn their Barack Hussein Obama songs at home?
Soon they may have a White House Communications Director who lauds the works of Chairman Mao.  Oh!  Sorry!  Too late eh?  Oh well, at least they aren't trying to discredit a news organization and have a public enemies list.  What's that?  I'm too late on that also!  Ugh!  Just when I think that President Obama cannot be beaten for the newest whacky-leftist leader, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown opens his mouth again.  He spoke recently about 'climate change,' saying that the world MUST come to an accord in Copenhagen.  Why so soon?  Well, in fifty more days it will be too late.  Thats right folks!  We only have fifty more days to save the world.  I'm guessing if we don't, then there will be some sort of horrendous space kablooie!!!!  ACK!!  RUN!!!

What a bunch of nutjobs.  Oh well!  At least our dear leader isn't keeping our troops on the battlefield without proper funding, orders or reinforcements.  What?  Oh man!!!  
Vote in 2010 and 2012 people.  This has to end with this term. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You Had To Be There...

Thats what I was told by one of my blogging friends who was in DC for the 9/12 rallies.  I'm still angry that I wasn't able to be there.  Last saturday
on september 12th I came home from work and put on the DVR.  I had set it to record all of Glenn Beck's coverage of the 9/12
project rallies.  My jaw was hanging on the floor.

MSNBC had said that 'upwards of 60,000 people were in attendance.'  CNN reported that 'tens upon tens of thousands flood to DC'

I have seen the time lapse pictures, and the overhead shots.  I can't count that high.  I've never seen so many people in one protest in my lifetime. 
There was a set of faces going from the capital all the way back to the mall and all the way back down the streets.  There were zero arrests.  I've never heard of a protest that size where there was no disorderly conduct.  All of this time we conservatives have been accused of being racists, violent, militia men, 'right-wing extremists.'  It was a nice bit of vindication.  These people on the television were not seething racial slurs, nor were they tipping over garbage cans and breaking into cars.  They were white, black, jewish, christian, gay and straight.  They had all come to simply let their voices be heard.  The government works for them, as it does for all of us.  As far as they are concerned, the performance review might not justify keeping some staff on hand :)

I went to work that day wearing my yellow 'Don't Tread On Me' shirt, instead of my typical work uniform.  I don't think my bosses mind.  I also was not worried about being yelled at or accosted.  A few years ago if I had worn something that profound of a political statement, say a 'Dubya' shirt circa 2005, I ran the risk of people saying something to me in public.  Not this time.  I live in a very liberal city in a very blue region of upstate NY, and the mood is changing.  People who knew I had voted republican in all the elections from 2000 on up, well, lets just say I was used to the looks they would give me.  It got old and even expected.  Not anymore.

I can wear my yellow shirt to the mall or market places and don't get eyes rolled at me.  I can drive with my conservative bumper stickers on my car and I don't get the finger.
((My girlfriend might say it was because of my driving when taking corners, but I'll stick with the bumper stickers.))  The mood of this country is shifting.  I don't know exactly where it is shifting, but it is.  That much is certain.  It may be shifting slightly over to the right, commonly called 'center-right.'  It's definitely not moving left.  It may not be going on a left-right scale at all.  This could be, if we were to graph it out a movement that is going on a diagonal.  If you want to add in a fourth dimension at the same time, it may also be going 'backwards.'  

Glenn Beck's 9/12 Project started on March 13th when he challenged his audience to meet back with him on the show on September 12th.  He unveiled the values and principled of the 9/12 project.  Glenn stated that he would show them what he had come up with in that time, and they would do the same.  Him and I had something in common, we were both astounded at the response.  The people all on their own printed T-shirts, organized by cities, and met up weekly or monthly.  They chartered buses and went down to DC, often from far away parts of the country.  It was true grass roots, and it was beautiful to watch.  In my city alone our group has 700 members and is growing fast.
What matters most is, we've got their attention.  It is not that the media is clueless, or that out-of-touch.  They aren't.  They know full well what is going on and how big it really is.  The problem is, is that long ago they made their bed, and now they have to sleep in it.  They got in the tank for President Obama, and are simply too deep in to get out now. He really is too big to fail, at least to them.  They backed this horse and now they have to wait around to hopefully collect some winnings, if there are any at the end of the race.

The final numbers came out a day or so later that close to 4 million people marched all around the country.  An estimated million or slightly over that in Washington DC.  These people were angry not just at Obama, but the democrats in congress.  They were angry at some of the republicans in congress, and at President Bush.  Our last president was responsible for the first TARP bill, which got this whole train of bailouts rolling.  

I remember sitting there watching the news one night last summer at my girlfriends house.  I saw the statements being made about the TARP bill, the bailouts of AIG and everything else.  I muttered to myself how at least whomever won the coming election, they couldn't possibly spend more than president Bush.  Well, sorry America!  I think I jinxed us!

The Obama administration did more spending in 8 months that president Bush did in 8 years.  It gets worse though, as you all know.  He not only outspent Bush, but he outspent every other president in United States history.  It's abhorrent, it is unsustainable.  When it gets to the point where we see another 50 billion and think 'eh, chump change,' it's bad.   We think in terms of trillions, but I am not sure we can all grasp how large a trillion is.  It is a billion, times a billion.  It's inconceivable.  It must be stopped.
We cannot afford this, and it will eventually break the back of this nation.  No one has ever spent their way into prosperity, just like no one has ever taxed their way into prosperity.    

Stop the spending.
Freeze it, unless it depends on national security.
Health Care can wait.  It doesn't need to be done this instant.
Slow down....

On and while you're at it, fire the damned Czars!!!  Stop sidestepping the constitution!!  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care Part 1: Echoes From The Past...

I will take any opportunity to start off things with a delicious pun, so lets get started!

President Obama and the democrats health care reform seems to be in, ‘critical condition.’ 

Ba dum bum.

Now I know that no one really objected to H.R. 3200 of course until they read it.  I have been working through it, and I must say I am terrified.  After only 50 pages into the 1000 plus page bill I found myself breaking out in a cold sweat and wishing I still consumed alcohol.  It’s all in there.  This will be part of a three part blog series where I will go over parts of the bill, using direct quotes and translation to the best of my ability.  I have two dictionaries and a thesaurus to understand the bill, but I’m working on it!

I wanted today to start off with a simple comparison.  It starts off with the now famous ‘death panels’ remark by former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin made on her Facebook page.  She spoke that there would be bureaucratic panels and advisory boards that might eventually come to decide which people could live and which could die.  Of course, she was not saying that someone with a Donkey pin on his shoulder and a set of horns could sneak in during the dark of night and literally pull the plug on grandma. 

What she was saying was that eventually it could come to the point where a panel would have to choose whether to save one life or another.  What is worrisome to her and many other people across the country is how we would gauge which life to save.  Would it be over whom was a more productive member of society, the younger and stronger being saved so that they might contribute more?  Could it be simply a matter of money?  Your surgery might cost less than mine, so you get to live, and I get the pain pills.  It doesn’t matter how it is decided.  It simply should not be allowed to ever happen.

There are many people who work in the Obama administration who are well known.  Rahm Emanuel is the president’s chief of staff, but someone who may not be so well know would be his brother, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel.  Dr. Emanuel is a top advisor to the president for medical policy.  The quote that is coming up again and again from Dr. Emanuel is from his advocating medical decisions being made on a system, which “produces a priority curve on which individuals aged roughly between fifteen and forty years get the most chance, whereas the youngest and older people get chances that are attenuated.” 

‘Angels and ministers of grace, defend us.’

Of course, Dr. Emanuel has said that his method of thinking has evolved.  It’s amazing this happened so quickly, since many of his views were written in January of this year!  It must also be a huge coincidence that he did not retract his views until he was called out on it. 

This kind of plan would of course favor the strong and leave behind the weak.  It comes eerily close to falling in line with the earlier ideals of perfecting society, perfecting people.  The early twentieth-century progressives believed in saving the ‘really fittest’ so that society could move forward without those who were considered undesirable by society polluting the gene pool.  They also believe that those who soak up the most health care, the elderly and the chronically ill, would be free up much needed money if they were allowed to die at a younger age. 

Lets go back to the progressive movement of the early twentieth century.  This is not just a progressive ideology but a mindset as well.  It is a bridge between socialism and secularism.  Authoritarians and statists, joining hands with a common view.  It is a viewpoint often seen in stark opposition from most conservative viewpoints.  We’ll go to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary for a definition on the Progressives:

Progressive: one believing in moderate political change and especially social improvement by governmental action

Progressive leaning ideologues come loaded with hubris.  They have a belief that people can be helped, or rather ‘helped along.’  Some other well-known progressives in history were Adolf Hitler, and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger.  At the time it was called The American Birth Control League.  Sanger had written books pamphlets and papers about how the lesser fortunate denominations of humans, such as the Aboriginal population of Australia (which she believed to be the lowest species of human, just above the ape) should not be allowed to reproduce or contribute further to the human race.  She was also opposed to American blacks, and the waves of Asian and catholic immigrants.

There were many other undesirable people that were brushed aside during this time period.  People with physical handicaps were ignored or institutionalized.  Those with forms of mental retardation were forcibly sterilized and hoped to no longer have an impact on society.  Presidents Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson were two very well known progressives, despite being on opposite political parties!  Wilson, a democrat, held the belief that the human race was something that could be improved upon.

I do not believe that there is a large shadowy conspiracy and there is no looming new world order.  There are however, people who hold common ideals.  People have held these kinds of ideals before, and others that were equally harmful.  When people who hold them come into power they can do a variety of damage.  There are still many people in office who consider themselves to be progressives.  Democratic house speaker Nancy Pelosi comes to mind first and foremost.     

Ironically, and I do say this not to try to stab anyone’s scientific beliefs, those who seem to believe in darwinism and evolution the most seem to be rather selective on where it applies.  If it is with animals on the Galapagos Islands it’s fine, but if it’s in your own backyard, then that’s something else.   It had better make sure it stays with the animals it seems!

Again I must stress once more that I do not believe in a huge conspiracy, no fifth column that needs to be toppled.  But, just like a group of fundamentalist Muslims might wish to impose Sharia law on those who do not share their beliefs, people who have money, power and influence might wish to organize things the way they see fit.

They will always believe they know what is good and what is right.  They believe they have the appropriate view for all.  Detractors try to say that the conservatives and religious among us will try to force our beliefs on others.  In reality, most conservative Christians and Jews want to be left to their own devices, and would respectfully do the same.  If they truly believe the books they have read, they would lead by example and hope that others follow.  They would not want anyone to come along whose arm they had to twist.  I wish I could say the same for the secularists and progressives…

They use money and power to influence the politicians and people.  When that fails, they will use the law.  They will truck in busloads of people in SEIU and Acorn shirts to intimidate the opposition.  They will camp out on your front lawn or spam you with e-mails. 

They have the hubris to believe that people need to be tended over like sheep.  People like President Obamas science czar John Holdren, who wrote in his textbook “Ecoscience” in the 1970s, about forced abortions, sterilants in drinking water and reducing the overall population of the planet for it’s own good.  The have the gaul to know not only what is best for themselves, but for everyone else too.  The little people simply do not have the status or brains to choose for themselves they will say…

When questions come up about individual liberty and freedom, or a persons right to choose for themselves, they will stare blankly at you.  How could you possibly not see it from their point of view?  They will see humans not as their fellow beings but as Lego’s and tinker toys from which they can create a new image.  If they are defeated, there will come a time for them to try again.  They will constantly hold up to the ideal that they can make people, ‘better.’

In the next two blogs that come, I will show how some of these ideas are not entirely gone…

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Planet Are YOU From, Mr. Frank?

Recently at a town hall meeting, Congressman Barney Frank (D-Mass) was in rare form.  He normally is snide and arrogant, but that day he was downright abusive.  He will no doubt say he was being reactionary, cashing in on the convenient excuse that apparently every town hall grouping is full of nothing but angry mobs carrying torches and pitchforks.  He asked someone what planet they were from when they were asking him questions about the health care bill.  He was not only condescending, he was utterly full of contempt for the audience.  I saw the video clips, and I think he truly believed himself above the 'little people.'  

Congressman Frank and others of his ilk do not live here on planet earth with the rest of them.  He is an extreme liberal, a group that is the smallest of all general political labels. (Republicans, Democrats, Independents, Conservatives and Liberals)  They do not know what it is to be out in 'normal' America.  They are almost always guaranteed re-election and never have to really put up much of a fight in their extremely liberal states and/or districts.  Barney Frank is from one of the most liberal districts in one of the most liberal states in the country.  Other democrats in this category would be Congressman Charlie Rangel (NY), Ted Kennedy (Mass), Dianne Feinstein (Cali), Nancy Pelosi (Cali), and Senator Barbara Boxer, who actually for the first time finds herself in dangerous polling territory against her 2010 assumed-to-be rivals Carly Fiorina and Chuck DeVore.  

These people are calling the protesters Nazis, thugs and ignorant hicks.  They are complaining at the audacity that these people have to stand up and voice their objections.  They don't like the fact that anyone would have any objections.  People like Rep Eric Massa (D-NY) said he would vote against his constituency's wishes and vote for H.R. 3200 (The democratic-written health care bill) even if they all told him not to.  He said he didn't care.  He spoke with arrogance, as if they 'little people' did not know what is best for them, and need to be told.  They all seem to bristle with that arrogance, as if they cannot be bothered with the serfs who do not seem to know what is best for them.

They do not know what a general election looks like.  They never have to fight and they have never had to deal with people who think other than what they think, until they started screwing with their healthcare.  They woke people up to how they truly view people.  They view people as something that can be pushed around and controlled, and they seem to have woken up the sleeping giant.

Speaking of H.R. 3200, I have downloaded it from the congressional website where it is available, and I am making my way through it.  My next few blogs will feature my findings and review of this monstrosity of a bill.   I've read 250 pages so far it and it is a complete train wreck, kind of like Obama's sales pitch these past few weeks!

Stay tuned!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Lost boys, we got 'em on the run!"

The title of today's blog is taken from one of my favorite movies when I was a kid, "Hook."  In the 1991 Robin Williams feature film, the final battle scene shows Peter Pan and his rag-tag group of 'lost boys' fighting and winning the battle against Captain Hook and his much larger group of pirates.  I thought of this the other day when I saw President Obama visibly angry or at least distressed at a press conference this week.  The topic of course was...health care!  ((Thunder and lightning!))  

Known for his cool, placid composure, it was surprising to see him scowling and fidgeting while answering questions.  I saw the same thing tonight as I sat and watched him talk tonight in his fourth televised press conference in six months of his presidency.  Six months into this administration he is finally being shown the downside of the job.  Not everything will go his way.  There were questions being launched at him that he did not want and did not expect.  I had to stand up and shout a few times as some of the most liberal members of the white house press corps gave him some questions that I never thought they would.  A few times my girl 'Marie' and I slapped high fives as he evaded one question after another, clearly not pleased with what he was getting.  

(To give my girl a sense of anonymity I will refer to her as 'Marie.'  Her real name will be kept private)

'Marie' and I giggled and laughed a few times as he made these long winded speeches that I believed were clearly designed to take up time.  I don't think he wanted to answer any more questions than he had too.  He didn't like what he was getting thrown at him at all.  I can't say I really blame him.  On the campaign trail he was asked softball questions, greeted by throngs of blindly adoring followers, and never had to take the bumps that the mainstream media would typically give a candidate.  Governor's Romney and Huckabee's personal faith were scrutinized by the various talking heads on prime time.  Endless quotes from Hillary Clinton were talked about, and we won't even get into what they put Governor Palin through.  Anything they could have looked into about then-senator Obama was largely ignored, save for a few commentators and talk radio hosts.

President Obama's health care overhaul could collapse before it ever gets off the ground.  The fact that some House and Senate democrats might be the reason in the end that it does not succeed has got to be driving Obama right up a wall.  Don't get me wrong, I'm glad for all of this.  It is certainly better than the alternative.  If it collapsed after it took off, it would probably take the entire United States economy with it.  Still, he is not exactly used to having things not go his way.  So far in six months he has had almost no opposition worth mentioning.  The republicans are outnumbered in the house, and there are sixty votes in the senate for the democrats.  Before there were sixty democrats in the senate, there were a few liberal republicans that were willing to make back room deals.  
 
On January 29th he signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.  February 9th saw the signing of an extension of the State Children's Health Insurance program.  The crippling blow for a generation came on February 17th when he signed The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (better known as the Stimulus bill) into law.  Later on came the Omnibus bill, which like the stimulus bill was loaded with pork projects.  On May 22nd he signed the Credit CARD Act, and then on Tuesday of this week he got the senate to strip funding for new F-22 Raptors.  The senate handed Obama a way to actually keep a campaign promise, cutting military spending.  Now I always give credit where credit is due, and I have to give some to Senator Chris Dodd, who spoke out on the senate floor warning that this would cost thousands of jobs.  Good job Chris, but your still in hot water for that whole sub-prime thing.   

A universal health care bill was up for consideration before in 1993.  President Clinton and then first lady Hillary wanted a single-payer universal health care bill passed quickly.  It bombed horribly when the American people learned what was contained in the pages of the bill, and spoke out.  The next year marked the republican takeover of congress, a signal of the public's disapproval with the way Clinton and the democrats were trying to cram things in quickly.  The current crop of congressional democrats may be radical, but they are by no means stupid.  They know that 2010 could be a painful flashback for them if this bill bombs out like its predecessor.  

This health care bill is being read as much as the stimulus bill was by members of congress.  For those playing the home game, this means that they are hardly reading it at all.  It is loaded with projects that do not save people money, or have anything to do with health care for that matter.  People are being made aware of this and it turns their stomachs.  It's now beginning to show in the polls, and that is giving President Obama his first wake-up call of the season.

I saw in my local paper today the results of a recent Associated Press-GfK Poll.  This poll shows that 54% of Americans now believe that we as a nation are on the wrong path. This figure is up from 46% in June.  President Obama's approval rating has broken down below the dreaded 60 mark, and now hovers at a cool 55%.  People who believe that Obama can help the economy have dropped down a sobering 19% from just before inauguration day.  The president is not the only one hurting in the polls.  The democrat-controlled congress has not been showing well for over a year and a half, and is now sinking lower once again.  They are currently hovering at 32%, and I would not be surprised if they sunk lower back into the twenties, which at that point you're down to blood relatives and a few staff members being the only ones giving you their approval.  

People fear waiting lists, rationed care and clogged emergency rooms.  They see people in Britain being denied treatments because they are not deemed worth it to try and save.  They see the enormous costs of the European and Canadian systems.  What's worse, if we go to a Canadian style single-payer system, then where will Canadians in need of a serious operation go?!  

Every time most or all of the republicans in congress vote against another huge expensive government project, I give them the ole' pat on the back and an "Atta boys!"  It's time I give the same to the American people.  Obama is like a paper champion, a boxer who has never fought a real battle.  He has finally been cut, and it has him frayed at both ends.

Keep at 'em!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tea Party, Blackout?

Well it was one eventful weekend was it not?  I myself attended a tea party here in my home city.  There were people coming and going constantly, but I believe there were about eleven hundred people total who attended all in all.  It was amazing to see.  The people were well behaved, there was no unruly behavior.  No mobs, no shouting with the police.  There were no bottles being thrown and there were no marches with people chanting angry slogans.  There was however, a large peaceful protest.  With music, speeches, prayer, and people talking about their common beliefs.

Those on CNN would have had you believe that the April 15th tea parties were full of zealots who were all frothing at the mouth with a chance to sacrifice an effigy of President Obama on a towering inferno of liberal bodies.  Not bloody likely...

Of course there are always a few radicals at each protest.  The radicals at the one I attended were not there in support of our cause.  I call them 'Truthers."  They are people, almost always in their early to mid twenties, who believe that 9/11 was an inside job.  These people do not simply blame republicans or democrats for their woes.  I do not know if they even believe the outlandish theories of the 9/11 inside job conspiracies make sense.  I believe personally that they just want to rally against something.  I think they are a new grade of anarchists.  They seem to want no government whatsoever, and they have no implications of that which they ask for.  Total anarchy and the chaos it could bring, are beyond imagination.  

These people at the tea parties did not want a bloody revolution.  They did not want to have Nancy Pelosi do am impression of Marie Antoinette's final minutes.  They do not wish for people to get their arms together, go to their local deli, and punch out foreign counter workers.  I saw none of that, and I doubt there was much if any of it at the thousands of other demonstrations around the country.

These people did not want their taxes being hiked to pay for programs they did not want.  A huge portion of the country according to Rasmussen and Gallup Polls, now strongly disapprove of the bailouts, Cap and Trade, socialized health care, amnesty for illegal aliens, and the nationalization of the banks and auto industry!  Sometimes up to as much of 80% of the people disapprove of the way that President Obama and the democrat congress are heading us in.  Let me correct that.  Warping.  They are shoving us to the left at warp speed.  They do not let the members of congress read the bills, and they call in votes at three o'clock in the morning sometimes to sneak them by the public.  The current laws are bypassed by 'czars' that are answerable only to Obama, and that do not need to be approved like a normal cabinet member.  People do not want socialism or insane spending.  This is still a center-right country.  

The people at the tea parties were there because they are angry.  They feel betrayed.  The people they voted in have not done what they asked.  You will know the ones that do, because they will stay in office after the midterm elections of 2010.  They ones that are angering people will be gone. (See: Harry Reid)  They do not want the debt to be piled on so high that we will never pay it off.  People are truly afraid that the dollar could crash and that we would have to rely on precious metals and the selling of first born children to pay for things.  When you print up money at a rapid pace to pay for things, inflation occurs.  The value of the currency goes down.  This will happen if we continue along at this pace.

They heard about people in Texas having their guns seized for no logical reason.  This angers them and scares them.  They see postings of theirs being taken offline, and off of myspace and facebook.  They see their first, second, and tenth amendment rights being trampled over and re-written.  None of us signed up for this.

This is why we were there.  The only question is, where was the media?  I know that with Governor Sanford, Governor Palin and Michael Jackson all being in the news that there were big stories out there, but with an estimated two million people organizing in all fifty states across the country, where was the media?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nothing is Sacred Anymore...

Today as I was getting ready to go to my dentist appointment, I paused and watched a flash on Fox News.   I was appalled to see that a gunman had walked into the Washington DC holocaust museum with a loaded gun in his hand, and opened fire.  He carried a rifle in his hands in plain sight and did not make it very far into the building, as he was yet to pass the entranceway or metal detectors.  (A brilliant man no doubt, as he obviously had some scheme to get an unconcealed rifle past the guards and metal detectors)

The security guards ordered him to drop the weapon, which he did not.  They shot at him then and he soon thereafter returned fire.  The gunman fatally shot one of the guards down, and he himself was wounded. He is currently lying in critical condition in a DC area hospital.  His name is James Von Brunn, and he is a known white supremacist author and website leader.  He has fallen far from his time as a Captain in the Navy.  He has published books on how the blacks and the Jews are out to ‘pollute the white gene pool.’  He also served time in prison, for which he blamed the ‘negro jury’ and the ‘Jew judge.’  Obviously, a model citizen…

            A holocaust museum brings to mind an anti-Semitic crime at the heart of its motivation.  For those of you playing the home game, this means a crime against a Jewish person.  What is even more trouble was how many people I thought could have fit this type of crime as the perpetrator: there are far too many groups of people who could have been suspected of committing a crime this disgusting.   Aryan supremacists, Klansmen, and radical Islamofacists all spring to mind readily, and still there are more.  I am reminded of the liberal protestors who during last summer when Israel was pounding away at the militants in Gaza proudly marched through the streets holding up signs that said “More Ovens For Jews.”  I’m also ashamed to think of the so-called Christian fundamentalists who are extremely anti-Semitic from the pulpit (Source: www.godhatesfags.com - these clowns are the more well known of the bunch).  Personally, I think they are a disgrace to the name of Christianity.  At the close of World War II, our soldiers helped to liberate the Nazi concentration/extermination camps such as Buchenwald, and Dachau.  General Eisenhower told his men to take photographic and video records of the atrocities committed there.   The buildings, the survivors, and victims were all documented. 

You can still find photos today of the General touring the Ohrdurf concentration camp in April of 1945.   He listened as the survivors told of the crimes committed by the SS.   He was careful to make a record of everything seen by him and his men, prophetically stating that one day, people would deny that these events had ever taken place.

Today that prediction has become as unfortunate a reality as any.  The president of Iran calls for Israel to be wiped off the map.  There have been ‘international peace conferences’ which have turned into Israel and US bash-fests.  President Obama’s pastor of twenty years, Rev. Jeremiah Wright today came out and said that Obama has not spoken to him in a year, because “those Jews won’t let him.” 

Anti-Semitism draws together the strangest of bedfellows.  White supremacist groups have been said to be in communication with al-qaeda, as their common enemy is the same:  The United States government.  Al-qaeda has declared war on us because of our close relations with Israel, as well as whatever else is bunching their underwear that particular day.  As for the white supremacists, they are probably still on that whole kick on how Israel and the Jewish people control the banks and government, attempting to take over the entire world.  (Someone should tell these geniuses that Israel right now is just trying to survive day-to-day, and doesn’t really have the time for that sort of thing.)              

When the state of Israel was created in May of 1948, there was a space set aside for the Palestinian people as well.  It was in the country of Jordan.  The Jordanians set the precedent later on of using the Palestinians as chess pieces, and excuses to attack the state of Israel.  Don’t believe for one second that the president of Iran is welcoming these people with opened arms.  I doubt he will ever extend the invitation or set out a welcome mat for them.  Many of the oil rich Arab countries today do not wish to help out the Palestinians in any way unless it will let them gain leverage over the people of Israel.  They have done nothing but fuel the anger the Palestinians have, instead of help it.  

After all the wars, attempted invasions and rocket attacks I know I would not ask Israel to give up any more land or make any more concessions.  This has all been tried before.  Presidents Carter and Clinton both held conferences with Arab and Jewish leaders, trying to broker a deal.  Both times Israel was forced to make concessions and we have seen how well that has worked out so far.

There are generations of people who have been raised to believe the Jewish people are their blood enemy.  They are brainwashed to the point where they will strap bombs to their women and children and send them to a crowded marketplace.  To make it worse, there are people of European descent, who still cling to the oldest and stupidest of stereotypes.  During the middle ages of Europe, the Pope decreed that all followers of Christ could not become bankers or handle large sums of money, as the profit would invoke sin.  This led the profession of bankers to be taken up by one of Europe’s minority groups: The Jews.  This ended up being a severe miscalculation, as it only caused jealously from those of the gentile persuasion.  This has lead to centuries of persecution and stereotypes still peddled by comics and presidents from oil rich nations today. 

Call me a skeptic, but I do not believe that a two state solution will change any of this.  President Obama is reportedly trying to get a two-state solution on the table from Israel by July.  As I have written before, I am glad that Benjamin Netanyahu was elected to the office of Prime Minister.  His country cannot afford mediocre or soft leadership at a time like this.

I have two hopes, at a time like this.  I hope that our government does not take advantage of this situation today at the DC museum.  Rahm Emanuel has said that one should never waste a ‘serious crisis’, and I can just see this being used as an excuse to crack down on other ‘right wing extremists.’  (As a right wing extremist, I’m offended to be compared to a scumbag like James Von Brunn)

I also hope that Israel and her people know that even if our president does not appear to stand with her, there are many of us who do. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Adventures of TOTUS and SCOTUS - Part 2

Well here we are for part two of The Adventures of TOTUS and SCOTUS!

Personally, I have a feeling Judge Sotomayor will be confirmed and added to the wonderful wide world of SCOTUS, the numbers in the congress of both democrats and limp-willed Republicans simply do not add up for a solid defeat.  I will however, point out one possibly bright side.  Judge Sotomayor has never come out and given her solid opinion on the issue of being pro-life or pro-choice.  She has either evaded the question, or never commented on it.  Her ruling history on it is mixed.  We know she was and is a devout catholic, and as such, being a catholic Hispanic, culturally that is a group very typically pro-life.  The one silver lining here is that she might possibly become a Souter or O'Connor, where they end up not voting as expected by those who appoint them.  If she came out and said she leaned even 51% to the pro-life side, her liberal street cred would be severely damaged, but she could wind up finding a few secret admirers from the right side of the isle.

On the other side of the news, TOTUS has been a severe disappointment as of lately.  He has not been throwing up any bloopers, and not been shutting off or moving his text along too quickly for Obama to follow.  I remembered all the wonderful speeches the president has given where he has said the wrong name, or spoken the wrong phrase, or gotten ahead of himself and asked his staff to 'back up' the teleprompter.  Maybe TOTUS is simply in a slump, but I'm praying he'll come around soon!  We certainly need the laughs, and right now Vice President Biden is all we have.  (Not as much comic relief as Bill Clinton, but he helps)

I hope it's all a big prank from TOTUS actually.  The bailouts,the pushing of a radical anti-religious and anti-capitalism agendas, not to mention the utter abandonment of everything that made this country such a great and unique experiment.  The biggest thing right now that is upsetting me, is Obama's foreign policy in regards to Israel.

There are generations of people in the Palestinian settlements, raised to hate the US and Israel.  Their children are the same as those who were holding up the victory sign on September 11th, 2001.  I know people who have lived in Israel, and people of Jewish heritage and faith who have visited it.  They all agree, that a two state solution will not work.

Obama recently said in his speech to the Muslim community that a two-state solution for Israel is a must.  Rumor also is that he asked Benjamin Netanyahu to procure a two-state solution by July at the latest.  I hope Netanyahu thoroughly disappoints the president.  Considering his entire campaign was based on no two state solution, I bet he will hold strong to his and many other peoples beliefs that Israel must remain whole, and the oppression of this state and it’s people, must finally end.   

Now if TOTUS tells us that he was pulling a big joke on us with Obama’s speech in Cairo, we could all have a chuckle and rest a bit easier.  Till next time!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tolstoy Said It Best...

"When in doubt, my dear fellow, do nothing."  
-Leo Tolstoy, Novelist, War and Peace

I have only recently come to realize just how profound a quote that is.  Think about it!  You have arrived at a crossroads in your life, and there is some huge decision that must be made.  No great decision should ever be made in haste.  When one does not have time to sort out their views or make their decisions properly, a mistake can be made.  You might not have time to consider other options that might not have come to you originally.  You could be under influence, being pushed or forced to make a decision one way, and pressure, second thoughts and more doubts can creep in along the way.  

In my life I have had to make choices that I knew would impact the rest of what was to come, just like everyone has.  Recently I had decided to finally answer doubts I had had for over a year about where my life was going.  There has been pressure on a side to choose a certain way, and I have decided that the above Tolstoy quote, given to me recently by my father, was the best piece of wisdom to fit the circumstances.  I did not want to back down from what I wanted, but I did not want to give in to the pressure or anger of other parties.  I had to do what was best for me. 
If people were to be angry with me, despite my flaws or failure to act earlier, at least I was glad knowing that they could be angry towards me for being honest, and not deceitful.  It's all about doing nothing, and letting the solution present itself.  Sometimes things need to be let go of, and sometimes they need to be allowed to crash.

It is a deep shame, that some people never learned this lesson.

Our newly minted president comes to mind.  I have to believe that when he walked into the Oval office the first day on the job, his mind was full of doubts.  I have to believe it only because I think that any human being would be filled with doubts.  This is of course, the biggest job in the world!  Who could come into it with a clear-cut plan, and no second thoughts at all?

I believe that many people had had times of doubt over the past year when it came to a lot of things in this beautiful country we live in, the economy, the state of government.  It was the question on everyone's mind:  Are we doing the right thing?

Recessions have happened before, and often before hand there is a large stock market drop.  However, one fact many people are not aware of is that in about half of the declines of 10% or more in the stock markets had not been followed by a recession. (Jerry Seigel, Stocks From The Long Run)  In other cases, the stock market plunged after the recession was well underway.

The banks crashed in large part due to decades of government interference.  Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton both signed laws that allowed more and more lending to be forced out to lower incomes of people, even if the bank believed they people were not capable of paying the loans back. When the republicans and President Bush tried to warn about Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac back in 2002 and 2005, the democrats in congress blocked any real solutions.  People inside the companies like Freddie Mac knew that they were headed for the floor because they had been forced to make so many risk-laden loans.  David Andrukonis, the former Chief Risk Officer wrote a memo to former CEO Richard F. Syron in 2003 about such a collapse, saying it could do tremendous damage to the reputation and financial aspects of the company and country. It was also written later by several people inside the company that the CEO simply decided to ignore the warnings.  (At  Freddie Mac, Chief Discarded Warning Signs, Charles Duhigg, The New York Times, August 5, 2008)

There have been other housing bubbles in the US and around the world before this most recent one.  There had been other recessions.  People have found that when you look back, and we had meddled the least, the problems corrected themselves the quickest.  Harsh and hasty interference with a capitalist system usually turns out to be the proverbial 'wrench in the gears.'  It's too bad some people never do nothing, and let a new solution present itself.  War and Peace may be a lengthy read, but there are some valuable lessons to learn about patience.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »