About Me

Name: RedStateJD
Location: Rochester, NY
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Reagan to Palin - Pass The Torch.

I was fortunate enough to live in a city that was on the list of stops for Governor Palin’s book tour.  Of all the cities and areas in upstate NY, I didn’t expect it to be mine!  However as an organizer for 2012 Draft Sarah Committee, I was happy that I could potentially get my book signed and meet the governor.  I ended up walking out with a signed copy of 'Going Rogue,' a signed t-shirt (that my awesome girlfriend made for me) and an awesome experience under my belt! 

There were people from all walks of life.  Some were your average blue-collar working class Americans.  Some looked like they came from a little bit of money.  Some had been there waiting since the previous evening.  They were white, black, Asian, Latino, eastern Indian.  All ages.  

 Despite MSNBC’s Chris Matthew's claim that Palin’s supports were only rich, white and elderly, I saw a true cross section of America.  Considering that I live in a liberal city in a liberal state, I was really happy to see well over a thousand people lined up by the time the store opened.  I arrived a few minutes before 7:30, and the line went halfway across the plaza. (Quite a large plaza I might add)  The number of people nearly doubled by the time the doors opened an hour and a half later at 9:00.  The biggest surprise for me was the large group of people who were under twenty-five years old.  It was so exciting to see.  Another wonderful thing to see - there were only a handful of protestors, all of which looked like they were transplanted from 1968.

There were other organizers and political peeps there as well.  It was great to stand and just talk with people casually who were like-minded.  Some of them were fans of her policies.  Some of them were women who had never seen a fellow woman in public office who shared their views.  Most people were there because they believe that they may have found their champion.

 The last two Republican presidents (Bush, and W. Bush) did some things that were really great, and made some pretty big mistakes.  Since the day that Ronald Reagan left office, conservatives have been searching for a true champion.  There is now a generation of young Americans that have grown up without a truly inspiring leader on the right side of the aisle. 

There are other leaders in the GOP that are decent speakers with some conservative cred.  Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee is now a member of the talk show crew, and his time as a Baptist minister certainly helps with the public speaking.  A lot of people are unhappy with how often Huckabee would try to get along with the democrats a-la John McCain. 

Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney (Who I must disclose I am a huge fan of) is a very sharp speaker and looked tailor-made to be a president.  He has excellent economic credentials, ran the 2002 Olympics and was a successful governor, elected in a very liberal state.  However some people still have questions about the health care plan he tried to enact during his time in office.  He will no doubt have to answer those questions if he decides to run again.

Sarah Palin is a triple-threat.  She can rally a crowd while appearing personable.  She has conservative credentials, and she can tout a successful string of jobs.  She was elected to City Council, then Mayor, then was the Chairperson of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, and then finally Governor.  While she did resign her term as governor prematurely, she did so only because the frivolous lawsuits kept her from doing her job.  It was not often reported in the main-steam media that during her term as governor she enjoyed approval ratings in the high eighties.

She comes off like your neighbor.  She is hitting two cities a day, signing over a thousand books per stop.   When she entered the store and waved to the crowd outside, you would have sworn that Michael Jackson was in to sign copies of the Thriller album in 1984.  The cheers were deafening. 

She is a personable and genuine person, who is on what many people believe to be the ‘right’ side of the issues. (ba dum bum) For the first time in forty years, more people in the country are pro-life than pro-choice.  The tea party movement has not only shown disgust with the current administration, but with mistakes made from the Bush years as well.  They despise the rapid growth in government that has taken place since the year 2001.  Palin is a small-government reformer who could if elected to the presidency, reduce the size of bureaucracy and government the way Ronald Reagan did in the eighties.

That’s something we could all use.  Imagine a world with government half the size it is now.  Imagine a government not so politically correct that we have a ‘civil court’ trial for the 9/11 mastermind planners so that we can curry favor with the rest of the world.  Imagine a bureaucracy not so clogged with useless pencil-pushing jobs that soak up taxpayer money.  Imagine a government not hell-bent on pushing economic crippling bills like Cap-and-Trade and Health Care reform.  I imagine it every day. 

Run Sarah Run.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What A Week It Has Been...

Before I really get rolling, I want to take a minute and talk about the horrific events at Ft. Hood that took place yesterday. 

I’ve always been a staunch supporter of the United States Military, and its personnel. I was coming home from work and saw it on the news when I walked in the house. It was one of the most disgusting displays of humanity that I had seen since September 11th. This man, Maj. Nidal Malik Hassan, did something deplorable. He was known to be politically against the war, and had spoken about how Muslims should not be made to fight other Muslims. He had had a recent past of poor performance reviews, and decided to take the coward’s way out.

Chanting “Allahu Akbar” (god is great) he turned his guns on his fellow soldiers. He killed 13 and wounded over thirty others. This country and it’s military gave him a chance, a life, and an education. Nearly half a million dollars I hear in that education too. It’s disgusting that this is how he chose to show himself. He ended up being a terrorist, a scumbag, and a disgrace to the uniform.

I want to say that my thoughts and prayers are with the men and women of Ft. Hood. I also want to say that I wish they had killed him when he was taken down.

Okay, now onto what I was originally had written, which deals with the election victories for the GOP this week.

I’ll admit I did a little bit of partying on behalf of the GOP victories.   After losing two straight elections, it was a pleasant surprise to see some life breathed back into the Republican brand. These were not RINO’s taking home the gold either. These people were running as Tax-cutting, small-government, traditional-valued conservatives.  

The State of Virginia was painted red across the board, as Republican Bob McDonnell beat out Democrat Creigh Deeds, 58% to 41%. To have a Republican win with a 17-point margin of victory in a state Obama won soundly last year is fantastic for the GOP brand. McDonnell is not the only one celebrating in Virginia today.   The Republican candidates for Lt. Governor and state Attorney General also won decisive victories. Three-for-three in ‘The Old Dominion State.’

Virginia showed quite a turnaround in exit polling from last year’s results. In polls conducted by Edison Research, we saw a dramatic change from last year. In 2008 the number of people who identified themselves as members of the GOP hug at about 33%. This year it topped 37%. During last year’s election, the number of self-described Democrats was at 39%. This year it is down to 33%. 

Creigh Deeds spent a decent amount of time trying to show that McDonnell’s conservative cred meant that he was oppressive towards women, but according to those polled, McDonnell took women 54% to 46%, and ‘working’ women even preferred him over Deeds 51% to 48%. 

The top issues in Virginia were the economy by 47%, health care by 24% and taxes by 15%. Conservatives and Republicans both showed up in greater numbers than in 2008, and it paid off. 

In New Jersey, it was nothing short of divine intervention. This is the bluest of blue states, and an incumbent Democrat governor should have sailed right through to victory. Christie in fact led the race for most of the past few months. Even with Obama coming multiple times to campaign for him, Corzine still lost, 48% to 44%. (Independent candidate Jim Daggett took the remainder of the vote) 

Independents made up twenty-five percent of the vote, and they favored Christie over Corzine, 60% to 30%. Members of the GOP voted solidly for Christie, 91% and 6% for Corzine. Registered Democrats were less loyal, going 88% for Corzine and 8% for Christie. Moderates for the most part were split, but still favored Christie, 48% to 45%. Conservatives, who were out in huge numbers in New Jersey, favored Christie by 88%.

The most important issues in New Jersey were the economy with 32%, Property Taxes (Highest in the nation) with 26%, corruption with 20@ and health care, 17%.  

In a brief note about the special election of New York’s 23rd district, all conservatives and Republicans can learn an important message here:

1)      1)  Pick conservative candidates, and not traitorous RINO’s who will either NOT champion liberal causes’ or betray their party by endorsing the Democratic candidate.

2)       2)  Learn whom in the party to trust more. Sorry Newt, but Palin’s endorsement won that round. Not only did her endorsement put Hoffman in the lead for a while, she proved to be a true force to be reckoned with. Hoffman nearly won as a third party conservative candidate in a blue state. People do like Sarah, and her endorsements. 

The elections also brought other surprises. The state of Maine became the 31st in a row to vote down Gay Marriage. Maine is no red state, and I was sure this was going to pass with popular vote. Barack Obama may have won in what was called an electoral landslide, but he did not win in an ideological one. Many people voted on their anger towards president Bush, which is just moronic. Ya know, because he wasn’t on the ticket! 

The United States is still a center-right nation. People may have voted in change last year, but it wasn’t what they thought it was going to be. This is only the beginning. They woke up the sleeping giant, and the conservatives are being led to the polls once again.  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fall Cleaning

The winds are poised to shift next week in a few major elections.  While it is an unusual thing, watching for election results on an odd year, these certainly are unusual times.  Two of these races are for the gubernatorial positions of Virginia and New Jersey.  A Republican victory in either state could start the swinging of a pendulum.    Today Virginia is one of the most ‘purple’ states in the union.  Neither red nor blue, it is a true swing state.  This is also a race with no incumbent.  The GOP has put up state Attorney General Bob McDonnell, who as of this week is running with 55% support according to a Washington Post poll.  On the Democrat side of the isle we have state senator Creigh Deeds, who is running with 44% support. 

            If this were New York or Texas, this would not be such a fun race to watch.  We typically know who is going to win if the state is solidly Democrat or Republican.  But this is Virginia, a state with an outgoing Liberal Democrat Governor, and a republican majority in the 100-seat Virginia House of Delegates.  (The Republicans currently hold 53 of those hundred seats.)  This race could go either way, but the fact that McDonnell is 11 points ahead in a state that went for Barack Obama in last year’s election.

            Last year when Barack Obama won with 365 electoral votes to John McCains 173, the media and the entire Democrat party wrote off conservatives and Republicans as a dead breed.  It was the first time a Democratic presidential candidate had won with more than 50% of the vote since Jimmy Carter. (With that landslide 50.1%)

            Just nine months into his presidency we are witnessing the results.  Massive spending increases.  I never thought anyone could outspent President Bush, but Obama proved me wrong in a matter of weeks.  He has continued to push a massive health care bill that the public does not want in any poll.  He has delayed sending troops to Afghanistan, however he has mulled sending them to Fox News.  The Tea Party movement is the beginning of what could be a huge backlash towards the arrogant presumption that the Whitehouse and entire democrat party have exuded since November of last year.

            In New Jersey you have a different entity altogether.  This is one of the most liberal, one of the most ‘blue’ states in the union.  Liberal Democrat incumbent governor Jim Corzine is in a race too close to call in any poll taken.  GOP challenger Chris Christie has been outspent 24 million to 9 million.  The fact that he is a stones throw away from winning this race with that kind of money being thrown to derail him is amazing.  Some would say a miracle, but then Richard Dawkins would have to step in and write a book about it.

            It would be an upset and a gift to the state of New Jersey if Christie pulled out the win here.  It would be a bigger message to Democrats in conservative states or districts if either of these two GOP challengers won.  It would signal that President Obama’s policies are not the current trend they were broadly proclaimed to be.  Politicians are scared of never getting re-elected, and they have a gift for seeing which way the wind is blowing, and switching sides.  Worrying about re-election would make some of them in conservative areas less likely to want to help Nancy Pelosi push her socialist agenda further.  It would be a potential gift for those of us who oppose that monstrosity of a health care bill she put forth Thursday, all 1,990 pages of it!

            Finally, there is a race in my home state of New York in the 23rd congressional district.  Here we have a very conservative district in New York (One of the two some would say) where you have a three-way race.   Republican John M. McHugh was tapped to be Secretary of the Army on September 21st, so Governor Paterson of New York called a special election.  Under New York law, there are no primaries for special elections.  If there had been, Doug Hoffman would have probably cleaned the clock of Deirdre Scozzafava.  She is a liberal Republican member of the NY state assembly, but secured the party’s nomination.  On the democrat side, attorney Bill Owens was nominated.  Doug Hoffman was nominated on behalf of the conservative party, who felt that Scozzafava was far too liberal to represent them in their district. 

            This race truly caught fire when Sarah Palin threw her support behind Doug Hoffman.  She still carries a lot of clout with conservatives in this country, and now Doug Hoffman is showing in the polls enough to possibly pull off an upset.  Palin has said she does not support a third-party movement in this country, but rather wants to show the Republican Party that they could pick better candidates.

            I wish Hoffman, Christie and McDonnell luck.  Any of these three winning would be a blessing, and it would be nice for a change to see the looks on the Democrats faces when they realize that their policy’s are truly not a well-received as they believe.  They still all need our support though, so keep it up!!

            

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Realize Who We Are Dealing With

Does anyone know the exchange rate for thirty pieces of silver?  I don't mean todays market price.  I was actually thinking of what it would have been worth around the year 33 AD.  Anyone know?  Only reason I ask is, I am curious to see if the final estimated amount ended up in either Senator Olympia Snowe's or Susan Collin's bank account recently.  I'm just asking!
We all know that politics is a dirty business.  It is not that far fetched to believe that two liberal-leaning republican senators could have been promised money to fund their pet-projects in order to give their vote to the health care bill.  Those two votes, if indeed they vote that way, cover for a few 'blue-dog' democrats that don't want to loose their jobs next election-cycle.  They give the comfort zone necessary to pass the bill, and the excuse for Obama and the congressional democrats to say this bill is passed with 'bipartisan support.' Sorry Mr. President, but two liberal republicans out the whole mess of them serving in congress currently is hardly bipartisan.  The military refit programs under President Reagan, an the Welfare Reform Acts under President Clinton would be far better examples.  While I identify with President Reagan much more than Clinton, I can at least respect Clinton for his pragmatism and his ability to look beyond his ideology.  When that man had his back against a wall, he knew when to bargain and when to shift.  Thats how someone who is a leader of a people gets things done.  You don't keep hitting your head against a brick wall, hoping the other side will give in.  We pay our leaders to work together, and sometimes that means bargaining and compromise.
President Obama is a different animal altogether.
I firmly believe that President Obama is willing to commit political suicide to pass health care reform.  While the numbers of support keep slipping, I have no doubt he will 'sacrifice himself' for the greater good.  By the way, anytime you hear leaders talking about the greater good, be prepared to hum the old Soviet anthem. 
I've said before that it takes a great amount of arrogant presumption to believe you know what is best for 300 million people.  Every leader wants to try and do what is best for their people, but they should never cross over into "I know what's better for you than you do."  Suggesting a good idea and winning over public support is one thing.  Ramming it down their throats when they say no is another thing entirely.  They have tried the moral argument.  They have tried the urgent one.
Soon it will be that they're going to make it very hard financially for your employers to not dump you onto the public option.  Then it will be mandatory 'volunteering' and community service.  Then it will be illegal to homeschool your children.  After all, how would they learn their Barack Hussein Obama songs at home?
Soon they may have a White House Communications Director who lauds the works of Chairman Mao.  Oh!  Sorry!  Too late eh?  Oh well, at least they aren't trying to discredit a news organization and have a public enemies list.  What's that?  I'm too late on that also!  Ugh!  Just when I think that President Obama cannot be beaten for the newest whacky-leftist leader, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown opens his mouth again.  He spoke recently about 'climate change,' saying that the world MUST come to an accord in Copenhagen.  Why so soon?  Well, in fifty more days it will be too late.  Thats right folks!  We only have fifty more days to save the world.  I'm guessing if we don't, then there will be some sort of horrendous space kablooie!!!!  ACK!!  RUN!!!

What a bunch of nutjobs.  Oh well!  At least our dear leader isn't keeping our troops on the battlefield without proper funding, orders or reinforcements.  What?  Oh man!!!  
Vote in 2010 and 2012 people.  This has to end with this term. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You Had To Be There...

Thats what I was told by one of my blogging friends who was in DC for the 9/12 rallies.  I'm still angry that I wasn't able to be there.  Last saturday
on september 12th I came home from work and put on the DVR.  I had set it to record all of Glenn Beck's coverage of the 9/12
project rallies.  My jaw was hanging on the floor.

MSNBC had said that 'upwards of 60,000 people were in attendance.'  CNN reported that 'tens upon tens of thousands flood to DC'

I have seen the time lapse pictures, and the overhead shots.  I can't count that high.  I've never seen so many people in one protest in my lifetime. 
There was a set of faces going from the capital all the way back to the mall and all the way back down the streets.  There were zero arrests.  I've never heard of a protest that size where there was no disorderly conduct.  All of this time we conservatives have been accused of being racists, violent, militia men, 'right-wing extremists.'  It was a nice bit of vindication.  These people on the television were not seething racial slurs, nor were they tipping over garbage cans and breaking into cars.  They were white, black, jewish, christian, gay and straight.  They had all come to simply let their voices be heard.  The government works for them, as it does for all of us.  As far as they are concerned, the performance review might not justify keeping some staff on hand :)

I went to work that day wearing my yellow 'Don't Tread On Me' shirt, instead of my typical work uniform.  I don't think my bosses mind.  I also was not worried about being yelled at or accosted.  A few years ago if I had worn something that profound of a political statement, say a 'Dubya' shirt circa 2005, I ran the risk of people saying something to me in public.  Not this time.  I live in a very liberal city in a very blue region of upstate NY, and the mood is changing.  People who knew I had voted republican in all the elections from 2000 on up, well, lets just say I was used to the looks they would give me.  It got old and even expected.  Not anymore.

I can wear my yellow shirt to the mall or market places and don't get eyes rolled at me.  I can drive with my conservative bumper stickers on my car and I don't get the finger.
((My girlfriend might say it was because of my driving when taking corners, but I'll stick with the bumper stickers.))  The mood of this country is shifting.  I don't know exactly where it is shifting, but it is.  That much is certain.  It may be shifting slightly over to the right, commonly called 'center-right.'  It's definitely not moving left.  It may not be going on a left-right scale at all.  This could be, if we were to graph it out a movement that is going on a diagonal.  If you want to add in a fourth dimension at the same time, it may also be going 'backwards.'  

Glenn Beck's 9/12 Project started on March 13th when he challenged his audience to meet back with him on the show on September 12th.  He unveiled the values and principled of the 9/12 project.  Glenn stated that he would show them what he had come up with in that time, and they would do the same.  Him and I had something in common, we were both astounded at the response.  The people all on their own printed T-shirts, organized by cities, and met up weekly or monthly.  They chartered buses and went down to DC, often from far away parts of the country.  It was true grass roots, and it was beautiful to watch.  In my city alone our group has 700 members and is growing fast.
What matters most is, we've got their attention.  It is not that the media is clueless, or that out-of-touch.  They aren't.  They know full well what is going on and how big it really is.  The problem is, is that long ago they made their bed, and now they have to sleep in it.  They got in the tank for President Obama, and are simply too deep in to get out now. He really is too big to fail, at least to them.  They backed this horse and now they have to wait around to hopefully collect some winnings, if there are any at the end of the race.

The final numbers came out a day or so later that close to 4 million people marched all around the country.  An estimated million or slightly over that in Washington DC.  These people were angry not just at Obama, but the democrats in congress.  They were angry at some of the republicans in congress, and at President Bush.  Our last president was responsible for the first TARP bill, which got this whole train of bailouts rolling.  

I remember sitting there watching the news one night last summer at my girlfriends house.  I saw the statements being made about the TARP bill, the bailouts of AIG and everything else.  I muttered to myself how at least whomever won the coming election, they couldn't possibly spend more than president Bush.  Well, sorry America!  I think I jinxed us!

The Obama administration did more spending in 8 months that president Bush did in 8 years.  It gets worse though, as you all know.  He not only outspent Bush, but he outspent every other president in United States history.  It's abhorrent, it is unsustainable.  When it gets to the point where we see another 50 billion and think 'eh, chump change,' it's bad.   We think in terms of trillions, but I am not sure we can all grasp how large a trillion is.  It is a billion, times a billion.  It's inconceivable.  It must be stopped.
We cannot afford this, and it will eventually break the back of this nation.  No one has ever spent their way into prosperity, just like no one has ever taxed their way into prosperity.    

Stop the spending.
Freeze it, unless it depends on national security.
Health Care can wait.  It doesn't need to be done this instant.
Slow down....

On and while you're at it, fire the damned Czars!!!  Stop sidestepping the constitution!!  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care Part 2: Read Between The Lines...

The opening line of H.R. 3200, like any other in a congressional bill describes what it’s intent is at the time of proposal.  This bill is no different.  This is the introductory statement from H.R. 3200:

H. R. 3200

To provide affordable, quality health care for all Americans and reduce

the growth in health care spending, and for other purposes.

The biggest problem I have for that is the last few words.  “…and for other purposes.”

What other purposes could there be?  It’s a freaking health care bill!  I read through the one thousand plus page bill with Wikipedia and the library of congress on other windows. 

When I look at famous documents in history, I notice that the most long lasting and sustaining of them are often the ones that are the most simply written.  The Magna Carta was written in 1215.  For over 710 years it has influenced legal documents all across the world.  It is 2500 words long, and easy to translate and easy to understand.

It helped to establish the rule of constitutional law over European and western style democracies.  It influenced the entire English-speaking world, including the United States Constitution.  The US Constitution is just 4,300 words, and is considered to be one of the most easy-to-read documents in political history.  The framers of the constitution wanted it to be easy to read so that it would be hard to misinterpret its meaning and intent. 

In stark contrast, the failed recent European Constitution was over 60,000 words long.  It was long, bloviated, and full of jargon that no one could understand.  It failed because people saw freedoms and liberties being sucked away through legislation carefully hidden away.  This brings us back to H.R. 3200.  This bill is 1,017 pages long and cannot be decoded unless you have two doctors, a law firm and the Rosetta stone.  I do not know what half of it still means.  I believe it was written like this on purpose.  It was written so that no one would be able understand it.  This was no accident. 

If I was a lawmaker in Washington and wanted to get a bill passed, I would make sure that it was easy to read and comprehend so that people would see how good an idea it was!  That sounds simple enough, right?  However if I was trying to sneak something in that I did not want anyone to know about, all I would have to do would be to hide it in plain sight. 

Page 58 talked about the need for a Health ID Card:

“…including whether the individual is eligible for a specific service with a specific physician at a specific facility, which may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identification card;”

Now this does not say it is going to be something like the scary RFID chip card or anything like that.  This is stating that a card issued to you, much like the card given by most health care providers today, might be outfitted with a code that can be scanned by a machine.  I want to ask a very simple question.  Isn’t it possible that this could be perverted into something other than what its stated purpose here is?  Isn’t it possible, from the country that brought you forced sterilizations and internment camps, that this could someday be used to carry all of your information, not just that of your health care provider?  Can anyone say that such a thing could be maintained without the temptation for abuse?

On page 102 of the bill, it says this:

AUTOMATIC ENROLLMENT OF MEDICAID ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUALS INTO MEDICAID.—The Commissioner shall provide for a process under which an individual who is described in section 202(d)(3) and has not elected to enroll in an Exchange-participating health benefits plan is automatically enrolled under Medicaid.

It is true that Medicaid is already a government ran facet of our health care system.  This to me is another option, another choice being made for you.

Page 124:

 (f) LIMITATIONS ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review of a payment rate or methodology established under this section or under section 224.

This page is describing how no one could sue the government for the pay it sets up for doctors and hospitals under the ‘public option’ insurance plan.  My guess is the pay would be substantially lower than the norm.  Personally, I’m ok with a neurosurgeon making 2 million dollars a year.  It’s one of the hardest jobs on earth.  I want them to be getting paid well so they continue to do well!

On page 167, we come to Title IV.  It reads as the following:

TITLE IV—AMENDMENTS TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986

Subtitle A—Shared Responsibility

PART 1—INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY

SEC. 401. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE

HEALTH CARE COVERAGE.

Pay attention to section 401 there.  It goes on to describe a tax of 2.5% of your yearly income if you do not have acceptable health insurance.  This means, the public option.  If you opt out, do not sign up, or stay on a private plan, you will face a penalty tax at the end of the year.  I should say it also says this, and it doesn’t matter if you sign up mid-year either.  The exact language reads like this:

 ‘‘(a) TAX IMPOSED.—In the case of any individual who does not meet the requirements of subsection (d) at any time during the taxable year, there is hereby imposed a tax equal to 2.5 percent of the excess of— ‘‘(1) the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross in- come for the taxable year, over ‘‘(2) the amount of gross income specified in section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer.

Thanks guys. You can choose to go it alone or sign up mid-year, and you will be taxed still.

There are other references to paying up to 8% of your income if you are a business owner.  Other parts say a 6% tax.  I’m not going to read the entire bill for you.  I would ask that everyone go and download it so that they may see for themselves.  This bill is scary to me.  I personally believe that it was written in such a manner on purpose.  There are things here that people do not want to you or I to see.  They want everyone to idly go by and not take notice.  The contents of this bill were leaked out and people went bonkers.  They would call us extremists for not wanting it, but I would prefer to say we are the ones who now hold the cards of common sense.

Given that the closest advisors to President Obama are Ezekiel Emanuel, John Holdren, Cass Sunstein, and up until Sunday, Van Jones (yippee!) can we afford to truly think this bill was not written with the minds of progressives?  I hope you read my previous blog, where I discussed how the modern health care debate can resonate with echoes of the progressive-pushed disasters of the past. 

It can still happen.  Cass Sunstein wrote a book called “Nudge.”  Take him at his word.  Radical ideas do not happen overnight.  They are nudged along, slowly but surely.  One stone to the next they are pushed along until one day you stand back and say ‘this is no longer the country I was born into!’    

These are the most patient people in the world.  This bill is another step, just like Cap and Trade, and the stimulus bill.  We must work to defeat them, so that they do not defeat us.  

 

 

 

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care Part 1: Echoes From The Past...

I will take any opportunity to start off things with a delicious pun, so lets get started!

President Obama and the democrats health care reform seems to be in, ‘critical condition.’ 

Ba dum bum.

Now I know that no one really objected to H.R. 3200 of course until they read it.  I have been working through it, and I must say I am terrified.  After only 50 pages into the 1000 plus page bill I found myself breaking out in a cold sweat and wishing I still consumed alcohol.  It’s all in there.  This will be part of a three part blog series where I will go over parts of the bill, using direct quotes and translation to the best of my ability.  I have two dictionaries and a thesaurus to understand the bill, but I’m working on it!

I wanted today to start off with a simple comparison.  It starts off with the now famous ‘death panels’ remark by former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin made on her Facebook page.  She spoke that there would be bureaucratic panels and advisory boards that might eventually come to decide which people could live and which could die.  Of course, she was not saying that someone with a Donkey pin on his shoulder and a set of horns could sneak in during the dark of night and literally pull the plug on grandma. 

What she was saying was that eventually it could come to the point where a panel would have to choose whether to save one life or another.  What is worrisome to her and many other people across the country is how we would gauge which life to save.  Would it be over whom was a more productive member of society, the younger and stronger being saved so that they might contribute more?  Could it be simply a matter of money?  Your surgery might cost less than mine, so you get to live, and I get the pain pills.  It doesn’t matter how it is decided.  It simply should not be allowed to ever happen.

There are many people who work in the Obama administration who are well known.  Rahm Emanuel is the president’s chief of staff, but someone who may not be so well know would be his brother, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel.  Dr. Emanuel is a top advisor to the president for medical policy.  The quote that is coming up again and again from Dr. Emanuel is from his advocating medical decisions being made on a system, which “produces a priority curve on which individuals aged roughly between fifteen and forty years get the most chance, whereas the youngest and older people get chances that are attenuated.” 

‘Angels and ministers of grace, defend us.’

Of course, Dr. Emanuel has said that his method of thinking has evolved.  It’s amazing this happened so quickly, since many of his views were written in January of this year!  It must also be a huge coincidence that he did not retract his views until he was called out on it. 

This kind of plan would of course favor the strong and leave behind the weak.  It comes eerily close to falling in line with the earlier ideals of perfecting society, perfecting people.  The early twentieth-century progressives believed in saving the ‘really fittest’ so that society could move forward without those who were considered undesirable by society polluting the gene pool.  They also believe that those who soak up the most health care, the elderly and the chronically ill, would be free up much needed money if they were allowed to die at a younger age. 

Lets go back to the progressive movement of the early twentieth century.  This is not just a progressive ideology but a mindset as well.  It is a bridge between socialism and secularism.  Authoritarians and statists, joining hands with a common view.  It is a viewpoint often seen in stark opposition from most conservative viewpoints.  We’ll go to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary for a definition on the Progressives:

Progressive: one believing in moderate political change and especially social improvement by governmental action

Progressive leaning ideologues come loaded with hubris.  They have a belief that people can be helped, or rather ‘helped along.’  Some other well-known progressives in history were Adolf Hitler, and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger.  At the time it was called The American Birth Control League.  Sanger had written books pamphlets and papers about how the lesser fortunate denominations of humans, such as the Aboriginal population of Australia (which she believed to be the lowest species of human, just above the ape) should not be allowed to reproduce or contribute further to the human race.  She was also opposed to American blacks, and the waves of Asian and catholic immigrants.

There were many other undesirable people that were brushed aside during this time period.  People with physical handicaps were ignored or institutionalized.  Those with forms of mental retardation were forcibly sterilized and hoped to no longer have an impact on society.  Presidents Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson were two very well known progressives, despite being on opposite political parties!  Wilson, a democrat, held the belief that the human race was something that could be improved upon.

I do not believe that there is a large shadowy conspiracy and there is no looming new world order.  There are however, people who hold common ideals.  People have held these kinds of ideals before, and others that were equally harmful.  When people who hold them come into power they can do a variety of damage.  There are still many people in office who consider themselves to be progressives.  Democratic house speaker Nancy Pelosi comes to mind first and foremost.     

Ironically, and I do say this not to try to stab anyone’s scientific beliefs, those who seem to believe in darwinism and evolution the most seem to be rather selective on where it applies.  If it is with animals on the Galapagos Islands it’s fine, but if it’s in your own backyard, then that’s something else.   It had better make sure it stays with the animals it seems!

Again I must stress once more that I do not believe in a huge conspiracy, no fifth column that needs to be toppled.  But, just like a group of fundamentalist Muslims might wish to impose Sharia law on those who do not share their beliefs, people who have money, power and influence might wish to organize things the way they see fit.

They will always believe they know what is good and what is right.  They believe they have the appropriate view for all.  Detractors try to say that the conservatives and religious among us will try to force our beliefs on others.  In reality, most conservative Christians and Jews want to be left to their own devices, and would respectfully do the same.  If they truly believe the books they have read, they would lead by example and hope that others follow.  They would not want anyone to come along whose arm they had to twist.  I wish I could say the same for the secularists and progressives…

They use money and power to influence the politicians and people.  When that fails, they will use the law.  They will truck in busloads of people in SEIU and Acorn shirts to intimidate the opposition.  They will camp out on your front lawn or spam you with e-mails. 

They have the hubris to believe that people need to be tended over like sheep.  People like President Obamas science czar John Holdren, who wrote in his textbook “Ecoscience” in the 1970s, about forced abortions, sterilants in drinking water and reducing the overall population of the planet for it’s own good.  The have the gaul to know not only what is best for themselves, but for everyone else too.  The little people simply do not have the status or brains to choose for themselves they will say…

When questions come up about individual liberty and freedom, or a persons right to choose for themselves, they will stare blankly at you.  How could you possibly not see it from their point of view?  They will see humans not as their fellow beings but as Lego’s and tinker toys from which they can create a new image.  If they are defeated, there will come a time for them to try again.  They will constantly hold up to the ideal that they can make people, ‘better.’

In the next two blogs that come, I will show how some of these ideas are not entirely gone…

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Planet Are YOU From, Mr. Frank?

Recently at a town hall meeting, Congressman Barney Frank (D-Mass) was in rare form.  He normally is snide and arrogant, but that day he was downright abusive.  He will no doubt say he was being reactionary, cashing in on the convenient excuse that apparently every town hall grouping is full of nothing but angry mobs carrying torches and pitchforks.  He asked someone what planet they were from when they were asking him questions about the health care bill.  He was not only condescending, he was utterly full of contempt for the audience.  I saw the video clips, and I think he truly believed himself above the 'little people.'  

Congressman Frank and others of his ilk do not live here on planet earth with the rest of them.  He is an extreme liberal, a group that is the smallest of all general political labels. (Republicans, Democrats, Independents, Conservatives and Liberals)  They do not know what it is to be out in 'normal' America.  They are almost always guaranteed re-election and never have to really put up much of a fight in their extremely liberal states and/or districts.  Barney Frank is from one of the most liberal districts in one of the most liberal states in the country.  Other democrats in this category would be Congressman Charlie Rangel (NY), Ted Kennedy (Mass), Dianne Feinstein (Cali), Nancy Pelosi (Cali), and Senator Barbara Boxer, who actually for the first time finds herself in dangerous polling territory against her 2010 assumed-to-be rivals Carly Fiorina and Chuck DeVore.  

These people are calling the protesters Nazis, thugs and ignorant hicks.  They are complaining at the audacity that these people have to stand up and voice their objections.  They don't like the fact that anyone would have any objections.  People like Rep Eric Massa (D-NY) said he would vote against his constituency's wishes and vote for H.R. 3200 (The democratic-written health care bill) even if they all told him not to.  He said he didn't care.  He spoke with arrogance, as if they 'little people' did not know what is best for them, and need to be told.  They all seem to bristle with that arrogance, as if they cannot be bothered with the serfs who do not seem to know what is best for them.

They do not know what a general election looks like.  They never have to fight and they have never had to deal with people who think other than what they think, until they started screwing with their healthcare.  They woke people up to how they truly view people.  They view people as something that can be pushed around and controlled, and they seem to have woken up the sleeping giant.

Speaking of H.R. 3200, I have downloaded it from the congressional website where it is available, and I am making my way through it.  My next few blogs will feature my findings and review of this monstrosity of a bill.   I've read 250 pages so far it and it is a complete train wreck, kind of like Obama's sales pitch these past few weeks!

Stay tuned!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Lost boys, we got 'em on the run!"

The title of today's blog is taken from one of my favorite movies when I was a kid, "Hook."  In the 1991 Robin Williams feature film, the final battle scene shows Peter Pan and his rag-tag group of 'lost boys' fighting and winning the battle against Captain Hook and his much larger group of pirates.  I thought of this the other day when I saw President Obama visibly angry or at least distressed at a press conference this week.  The topic of course was...health care!  ((Thunder and lightning!))  

Known for his cool, placid composure, it was surprising to see him scowling and fidgeting while answering questions.  I saw the same thing tonight as I sat and watched him talk tonight in his fourth televised press conference in six months of his presidency.  Six months into this administration he is finally being shown the downside of the job.  Not everything will go his way.  There were questions being launched at him that he did not want and did not expect.  I had to stand up and shout a few times as some of the most liberal members of the white house press corps gave him some questions that I never thought they would.  A few times my girl 'Marie' and I slapped high fives as he evaded one question after another, clearly not pleased with what he was getting.  

(To give my girl a sense of anonymity I will refer to her as 'Marie.'  Her real name will be kept private)

'Marie' and I giggled and laughed a few times as he made these long winded speeches that I believed were clearly designed to take up time.  I don't think he wanted to answer any more questions than he had too.  He didn't like what he was getting thrown at him at all.  I can't say I really blame him.  On the campaign trail he was asked softball questions, greeted by throngs of blindly adoring followers, and never had to take the bumps that the mainstream media would typically give a candidate.  Governor's Romney and Huckabee's personal faith were scrutinized by the various talking heads on prime time.  Endless quotes from Hillary Clinton were talked about, and we won't even get into what they put Governor Palin through.  Anything they could have looked into about then-senator Obama was largely ignored, save for a few commentators and talk radio hosts.

President Obama's health care overhaul could collapse before it ever gets off the ground.  The fact that some House and Senate democrats might be the reason in the end that it does not succeed has got to be driving Obama right up a wall.  Don't get me wrong, I'm glad for all of this.  It is certainly better than the alternative.  If it collapsed after it took off, it would probably take the entire United States economy with it.  Still, he is not exactly used to having things not go his way.  So far in six months he has had almost no opposition worth mentioning.  The republicans are outnumbered in the house, and there are sixty votes in the senate for the democrats.  Before there were sixty democrats in the senate, there were a few liberal republicans that were willing to make back room deals.  
 
On January 29th he signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.  February 9th saw the signing of an extension of the State Children's Health Insurance program.  The crippling blow for a generation came on February 17th when he signed The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (better known as the Stimulus bill) into law.  Later on came the Omnibus bill, which like the stimulus bill was loaded with pork projects.  On May 22nd he signed the Credit CARD Act, and then on Tuesday of this week he got the senate to strip funding for new F-22 Raptors.  The senate handed Obama a way to actually keep a campaign promise, cutting military spending.  Now I always give credit where credit is due, and I have to give some to Senator Chris Dodd, who spoke out on the senate floor warning that this would cost thousands of jobs.  Good job Chris, but your still in hot water for that whole sub-prime thing.   

A universal health care bill was up for consideration before in 1993.  President Clinton and then first lady Hillary wanted a single-payer universal health care bill passed quickly.  It bombed horribly when the American people learned what was contained in the pages of the bill, and spoke out.  The next year marked the republican takeover of congress, a signal of the public's disapproval with the way Clinton and the democrats were trying to cram things in quickly.  The current crop of congressional democrats may be radical, but they are by no means stupid.  They know that 2010 could be a painful flashback for them if this bill bombs out like its predecessor.  

This health care bill is being read as much as the stimulus bill was by members of congress.  For those playing the home game, this means that they are hardly reading it at all.  It is loaded with projects that do not save people money, or have anything to do with health care for that matter.  People are being made aware of this and it turns their stomachs.  It's now beginning to show in the polls, and that is giving President Obama his first wake-up call of the season.

I saw in my local paper today the results of a recent Associated Press-GfK Poll.  This poll shows that 54% of Americans now believe that we as a nation are on the wrong path. This figure is up from 46% in June.  President Obama's approval rating has broken down below the dreaded 60 mark, and now hovers at a cool 55%.  People who believe that Obama can help the economy have dropped down a sobering 19% from just before inauguration day.  The president is not the only one hurting in the polls.  The democrat-controlled congress has not been showing well for over a year and a half, and is now sinking lower once again.  They are currently hovering at 32%, and I would not be surprised if they sunk lower back into the twenties, which at that point you're down to blood relatives and a few staff members being the only ones giving you their approval.  

People fear waiting lists, rationed care and clogged emergency rooms.  They see people in Britain being denied treatments because they are not deemed worth it to try and save.  They see the enormous costs of the European and Canadian systems.  What's worse, if we go to a Canadian style single-payer system, then where will Canadians in need of a serious operation go?!  

Every time most or all of the republicans in congress vote against another huge expensive government project, I give them the ole' pat on the back and an "Atta boys!"  It's time I give the same to the American people.  Obama is like a paper champion, a boxer who has never fought a real battle.  He has finally been cut, and it has him frayed at both ends.

Keep at 'em!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PALIN! PALIN!

Well, it's been a while since Governor Sarah Palin dropped a tactical nuclear bomb on the country.  I of course am referring to her resignation from the office of Governor of Alaska.  She came swooping into this office and followed it up with some of the highest approval ratings in recent gubernatorial history.  She is also one of the most successful, working with people to get things done as she promised. 

I believe she is far more of a threat to the liberals and Democratic party than they would ever let on, both because of the way she reaches people, and for the values she proudly wears on her sleeve.  She is far more qualified than anyone of them would say, and she is far smarter as well.

In a short amount of time she has rooted out corruption in both major parties. Her state is one of the only ones in this deep recession showing a surplus of cash and energy.  She has cut billions from their spending budget for this fiscal year while still being able to meet all major priorities.  Her state did not need the stimulus bill, and she turned down the money when it was thrust upon her.   Why should she?  If you don't need it, don't spend it!  She fought the oil companies and fought to have her states vast resources of oil pumped down to the lower 48.  She knows that ANWR is full of oil and has none of the endangered species to protect we're told it does by the EPA and other agencies.  It's frozen tundra on top of buried treasure.  C'mon people!!!  People argue her state has a surplus because of the oil reserves.  I ask them to keep in mind that much of it, they have not been able to tap, pump, drill or sell, so therefore it does not help them with their budget or energy supply.  

Last week there was a USA Today / Gallup Poll that showed that a over two-thirds of republicans want Palin as the nominee in 2012, or at least as 'a major national political figure.'  I like to go deeper sometimes, beyond the poll numbers..

Today in America if you drop GOP or DEM from the polling questions, more people identify themselves as conservatives, a full 40%.  I know conservatives who are libertarian.  Some of them are members of the Constitution or American Independence parties.  There are more still who have no party at all, but are conservative at heart.

I was at a tea party on July 3rd, the day the governor announced her resignation.  There were over a thousand people from all races and parties, men and women, old and young who began to chant ‘PALIN! PALIN!’ 

Sarah Palin connects with regular Americans.  Some call them Reagan-Democrats, some call them ‘average joe’s.’  Their detractors call them hicks, farmers, rednecks and a whole slew of other people that they assume cling to their guns and religion.  (Ba dum bum)  She drew thousands upon thousands of people to her campaign rallies, and in fact she drew much more than the head of the ticket, Senator McCain.  No other conservative candidate has had that kind of draw with the American public since Ronald Reagan.  She is also equally polarizing.  It is a fundamental law of Newtonian physics that for every action there is an equal but opposite reaction.  If there was ever proof that physics applied to politics, then that proof is Sarah Palin.

For every person who is a fan, there is another who hates her.  For each person who came out to see her at a rally, one sat at home and called her stupid on Myspace.  People did not know why they hated her, but they did.  They wrote her off as a dunce, a fool, and a ditz.  The medias portrayal of her did not help at all.  For three months they beat the hell out of her, giving her questions about Bush’s policy that Bush and Cheney could not have answered, and offending her at other times with questions that were a waste of time.  When it comes to the mainstream media, our friend Sir Isaac Newton departs.

In the afore mentioned poll, three-fourths of republicans, over half of independents, and a full third of democrats say the media coverage of Palin had, and still has been unfairly negative.  When she was announced as Senator McCains running mate last year, the banner on MSNBC said “How Many Houses Does This Add To The Republican Ticket?”

Chris Matthews lambasted her on his show for a full five minutes for writing a book with the aid of a ghostwriter.  I guess he forgot about Hillary Clintons who had helped her with her book. 

Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric asked her questions that not only would they never have asked President Obama, but questions that were not too relevant to well, anything!  (Governor Palin later said that she paused and smiled during the Katie Couric interview because she could not believe what she was being asked half of the time.)  Add this onto the unbelievable bias that the mainstream media showed to Obama during the campaign, and it is a recipe for swaying public opinion.  If you happen to doubt that there was intense bias from the media favoring President Obama, then just ask his secretary of state.

I won’t even dignify the constant comments of people like David Letterman.  To do so would lead people to believe that I watch him.  He of course is free to say whatever he wants, no matter how tacky, tasteless or unfunny.  That’s the price of a free society, and I pay it gladly.

There were even some fellow republicans who were less than helpful.  Governor Palin had poor handlers on a poorly run campaign.  Personally, I think some of the former staffers, like the ones who contributed to the twenty-four page article in Vanity Fair, not only did not give their names out of cowardice, but out of selfish career aspirations as well.  I believe they would cite themselves as having helped written the article at any interview, or any step to them being hired to work on the campaign circuit again.  After how poorly the McCain campaign was run, I doubt many of them will work again.  They made two tactical blunders that sunk them.  The let Senator McCain off the leash, and they kept Governor Palin on one.

No one wants to hire a rat who deserts the ship even before it sinks, let alone one who runs to the press!  We all know people like this!  As soon as your back is turned they are running off to the media with juicy stories about you, and as soon as you turn around again they are giving you the smile and pat on the shoulder.  They go above your head to your boss and blame you for their mistakes.  If someone is going to accuse someone of such things, I’d rather they at least be brave enough to author their libel writings.

If someone does not like Sarah Palin’s policies or positions, that’s a personal call and I can respect that.  However, when I see someone who would instead say that they do not like her because she is stupid, or a dummy, or ‘too pretty,’ (I actually heard that from someone) or the ‘wrong kind of feminist,’ I get angry.  It is the same as someone who

Makes fun of a gay person, then when they are confronted they say ‘well, I guess I’m just more homophobic than I realize.’  They brush it off with a stupid excuse for their ignorance.  When people reside themselves to that all-too-comfortable kind of resignation, without the compulsion to find out why, or even the willingness to express it, it is as sad as it is inexcusable. 

If Governor Palin is so dim and inconsequential, as the elites, the media and Matt Damon would tell us, then why the constant attacks even after the campaign is long gone?  Do we not still ignore that which truly does not matter?  If she is not a threat, why still attack her?

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tea Party, Blackout?

Well it was one eventful weekend was it not?  I myself attended a tea party here in my home city.  There were people coming and going constantly, but I believe there were about eleven hundred people total who attended all in all.  It was amazing to see.  The people were well behaved, there was no unruly behavior.  No mobs, no shouting with the police.  There were no bottles being thrown and there were no marches with people chanting angry slogans.  There was however, a large peaceful protest.  With music, speeches, prayer, and people talking about their common beliefs.

Those on CNN would have had you believe that the April 15th tea parties were full of zealots who were all frothing at the mouth with a chance to sacrifice an effigy of President Obama on a towering inferno of liberal bodies.  Not bloody likely...

Of course there are always a few radicals at each protest.  The radicals at the one I attended were not there in support of our cause.  I call them 'Truthers."  They are people, almost always in their early to mid twenties, who believe that 9/11 was an inside job.  These people do not simply blame republicans or democrats for their woes.  I do not know if they even believe the outlandish theories of the 9/11 inside job conspiracies make sense.  I believe personally that they just want to rally against something.  I think they are a new grade of anarchists.  They seem to want no government whatsoever, and they have no implications of that which they ask for.  Total anarchy and the chaos it could bring, are beyond imagination.  

These people at the tea parties did not want a bloody revolution.  They did not want to have Nancy Pelosi do am impression of Marie Antoinette's final minutes.  They do not wish for people to get their arms together, go to their local deli, and punch out foreign counter workers.  I saw none of that, and I doubt there was much if any of it at the thousands of other demonstrations around the country.

These people did not want their taxes being hiked to pay for programs they did not want.  A huge portion of the country according to Rasmussen and Gallup Polls, now strongly disapprove of the bailouts, Cap and Trade, socialized health care, amnesty for illegal aliens, and the nationalization of the banks and auto industry!  Sometimes up to as much of 80% of the people disapprove of the way that President Obama and the democrat congress are heading us in.  Let me correct that.  Warping.  They are shoving us to the left at warp speed.  They do not let the members of congress read the bills, and they call in votes at three o'clock in the morning sometimes to sneak them by the public.  The current laws are bypassed by 'czars' that are answerable only to Obama, and that do not need to be approved like a normal cabinet member.  People do not want socialism or insane spending.  This is still a center-right country.  

The people at the tea parties were there because they are angry.  They feel betrayed.  The people they voted in have not done what they asked.  You will know the ones that do, because they will stay in office after the midterm elections of 2010.  They ones that are angering people will be gone. (See: Harry Reid)  They do not want the debt to be piled on so high that we will never pay it off.  People are truly afraid that the dollar could crash and that we would have to rely on precious metals and the selling of first born children to pay for things.  When you print up money at a rapid pace to pay for things, inflation occurs.  The value of the currency goes down.  This will happen if we continue along at this pace.

They heard about people in Texas having their guns seized for no logical reason.  This angers them and scares them.  They see postings of theirs being taken offline, and off of myspace and facebook.  They see their first, second, and tenth amendment rights being trampled over and re-written.  None of us signed up for this.

This is why we were there.  The only question is, where was the media?  I know that with Governor Sanford, Governor Palin and Michael Jackson all being in the news that there were big stories out there, but with an estimated two million people organizing in all fifty states across the country, where was the media?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"A Republic, if you can keep it..."

I'm going to a tea party later today in my home city, and then tomorrow I will gladly celebrate my favorite holiday, The Fourth of July.  Independence Day!

The title of todays entry is a quote from Benjamin Franklin.  It was spoken by him after a woman approached him upon his leaving the halls of the constitutional convention. The men had finished, and the document they gave us solidified our independence.  Of course years earlier we had fought and won our independence from the British.  We had a first document outlining our government, called the Articles of Confederation.  It was a disaster, because it was too weak, and nothing could ever get accomplished.  

The Constitution of the United States, is perfect.  They say perfection cannot exist, but it does.  It outlines a representative republic, and all of the rights of the people that truly can make them free.  It also outlines all of the necessary restrictions on the government so that it cannot become overbearing or too powerful.  It also left a way to fix itself, in the form of amendments.  It is at the same time, long lasting and rectifiable.  The founding fathers knew they might make some mistakes, but they also left a way to repair them, while making all of the liberty and freedom we desired so much a stronghold of our countries foundation.

Think about that while you cook out this weekend and blast off fireworks.  I will no doubt, be cooking out and blasting off as well.  I know exactly what this country is, and therefore I know what we all stand to loose.  "A republic, if you can keep it."  We could loose it in the blink of an eye, and once it is lost, it could never come back... 
Remember that it was outlined in such a way that government was the servant, and never the master.   Now we have strong-armed nationalization of the banks and auto industry.  Also the appointments of over two dozen 'czars' that can go around the congress or supreme court while doing the presidents bidding, skirting around the checks and balances.  It sounds to me like the trampling on our founding documents by a power hungry man.  It's sad.

Remember where we all come from.  If we can keep it, it will still be the greatest thing ever.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cap and Healthcare?

Well what a week!  Two weeks actually, since my last post!  It's been a whirlwind of topics come and gone in that time.  That'll learn me to be lazy!  

I was utterly appalled last night when I learned that the Cap and Trade (Cap and Tax?) bill passed the house.  I was not surprised, with the clear democrat majority, but I was surprised at the number.  Close to thirty democrats voted against it, and eight republicans voted for it.  I know exactly what that does and does not mean.  It does not mean that 30 democrats voted their conscious and went against their party's core religious belief of Global Warming.  (Ugh!  More on that in a moment.)  I believe that there were thirty or so democrats who were voted in, in largely republican or conservative districts that they felt would be in danger of being ousted when people get ticked off at how much their electrical bills skyrocket.  Half of the country gets their electricity from coal.  When this bill goes into effect, it will double and triple the cost of power to people in coal-fire areas just so the companies can stay in business.

They voted strategically.  If it didn't pass once, they could always pass it again with their clear majority.  They have the numbers do to so easily.  The eight republicans who turned, should be ousted.  I'm not such a blanket-conservative that I want more Arlen Spector's in the party.  I'd rather make way for a Marco Rubio (www.marcorubio.com) or a Chris Lee. (chrislee.house.gov)  But no matter.  They got their thirty pieces of silver I'm sure.  I just hope they don't act surprised when they get sucker punched by the Romulans, ermm, I mean democrats.  They should not act surprised when the Republicans don't show them they love anymore either.

This Cap'n Tax Bill is in effect, the largest tax increase in American history.  It could eliminate up to 2.5 million jobs, and will double and in some cases triple the cost of a families energy bill.  There are cleaner and more efficient ways of producing electricity here in the Twenty-first century.  It's called nuclear power.  Of course this is a big huge evil horrible environmental issue that once hurt some ducks in Russia, so we can't have any of that!!!  

The French have 70 percent of their power in cheap clean nuclear reactors, and we have less that 25 percent?  Please explain that to me god!

Anyone who wants to open a new coal plant will be crippled by the taxes.  Those in existence will not be able to support their current work force.  They will have so many new taxes that it will raise the prices of electricity for everyone else.  Businesses and families will suffer.  Some will have their lights out, or have to go without heat in the winter.
All of this is in the name of Global Warming.  Oh whoops!  Sorry!  I got this memo here, it's now called 'climate change' since global warming cannot be proven after fifteen years of hard research.  Nowadays there are more scientists who are against it than are for it.  They are not let into the debates.  Only a regime with something to fear does not welcome in the opposing side.  Those who know they are right, have nothing to fear from hearing the opposing view.  Those who do not stand on sturdy ground do not wish to be rocked, as they might slip and fall.  

More scientists are turning their backs on the idea of global warming.  In fact more and more now believe that the Earth might be moving into a 'global cooling period' where temperatures might drop.  This is not because of man-made activity, but because of the natural cycle of the planet.  For years the sun has been spewing off gigantic solar flares, that were causing temperatures to rise across the entire solar system.  (They even melted the ice oceans of Jupiter's moon Europa, which is twice the distance of the sun from us...Oh hell, can't be related right?)

In the 1970's they wanted us to believe in a man made form of climate change.  It was believed that the oceans were melting, the atmosphere was in danger, and we would all be starving.  The only answer was to cut down on our factories and limit our population.  They called it:  Global Cooling!  Well, long story short no one believed that bunch of Bulls**t, so they repackaged it and sold it to us again as Global Warming.  Now they just call it climate change.  What a wonderfully passive phrase.  It doesn't sound like it means anything, yet it does!  The climate is changing!  I guess our coal plants that employ thousands and thousands of people cause the last ice age to melt too, twenty thousand years ago.  I guess the Neanderthals went extinct because of gasoline and coal, not because of the receding woodlands and cold habitat of Europe that they were built for.

Environmental change has wiped out civilizations and animals of all kinds for thousands and thousands of years.  This is the way of things.  You would figure that all of these people who are so hot for nature would understand it.  They believe in evolution, one of the definitions of which is 'change over time.'  Why can that not include the planet?  
Time to go save some money.  It'll be nice to have to pay higher taxes.  The democrats have told me I like doing that.  ::rolling eyes:: 

Oh yeah!  I almost forgot!  There was another thing to my title.  Socialized Healthcare.  Just Say No!  :)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nothing is Sacred Anymore...

Today as I was getting ready to go to my dentist appointment, I paused and watched a flash on Fox News.   I was appalled to see that a gunman had walked into the Washington DC holocaust museum with a loaded gun in his hand, and opened fire.  He carried a rifle in his hands in plain sight and did not make it very far into the building, as he was yet to pass the entranceway or metal detectors.  (A brilliant man no doubt, as he obviously had some scheme to get an unconcealed rifle past the guards and metal detectors)

The security guards ordered him to drop the weapon, which he did not.  They shot at him then and he soon thereafter returned fire.  The gunman fatally shot one of the guards down, and he himself was wounded. He is currently lying in critical condition in a DC area hospital.  His name is James Von Brunn, and he is a known white supremacist author and website leader.  He has fallen far from his time as a Captain in the Navy.  He has published books on how the blacks and the Jews are out to ‘pollute the white gene pool.’  He also served time in prison, for which he blamed the ‘negro jury’ and the ‘Jew judge.’  Obviously, a model citizen…

            A holocaust museum brings to mind an anti-Semitic crime at the heart of its motivation.  For those of you playing the home game, this means a crime against a Jewish person.  What is even more trouble was how many people I thought could have fit this type of crime as the perpetrator: there are far too many groups of people who could have been suspected of committing a crime this disgusting.   Aryan supremacists, Klansmen, and radical Islamofacists all spring to mind readily, and still there are more.  I am reminded of the liberal protestors who during last summer when Israel was pounding away at the militants in Gaza proudly marched through the streets holding up signs that said “More Ovens For Jews.”  I’m also ashamed to think of the so-called Christian fundamentalists who are extremely anti-Semitic from the pulpit (Source: www.godhatesfags.com - these clowns are the more well known of the bunch).  Personally, I think they are a disgrace to the name of Christianity.  At the close of World War II, our soldiers helped to liberate the Nazi concentration/extermination camps such as Buchenwald, and Dachau.  General Eisenhower told his men to take photographic and video records of the atrocities committed there.   The buildings, the survivors, and victims were all documented. 

You can still find photos today of the General touring the Ohrdurf concentration camp in April of 1945.   He listened as the survivors told of the crimes committed by the SS.   He was careful to make a record of everything seen by him and his men, prophetically stating that one day, people would deny that these events had ever taken place.

Today that prediction has become as unfortunate a reality as any.  The president of Iran calls for Israel to be wiped off the map.  There have been ‘international peace conferences’ which have turned into Israel and US bash-fests.  President Obama’s pastor of twenty years, Rev. Jeremiah Wright today came out and said that Obama has not spoken to him in a year, because “those Jews won’t let him.” 

Anti-Semitism draws together the strangest of bedfellows.  White supremacist groups have been said to be in communication with al-qaeda, as their common enemy is the same:  The United States government.  Al-qaeda has declared war on us because of our close relations with Israel, as well as whatever else is bunching their underwear that particular day.  As for the white supremacists, they are probably still on that whole kick on how Israel and the Jewish people control the banks and government, attempting to take over the entire world.  (Someone should tell these geniuses that Israel right now is just trying to survive day-to-day, and doesn’t really have the time for that sort of thing.)              

When the state of Israel was created in May of 1948, there was a space set aside for the Palestinian people as well.  It was in the country of Jordan.  The Jordanians set the precedent later on of using the Palestinians as chess pieces, and excuses to attack the state of Israel.  Don’t believe for one second that the president of Iran is welcoming these people with opened arms.  I doubt he will ever extend the invitation or set out a welcome mat for them.  Many of the oil rich Arab countries today do not wish to help out the Palestinians in any way unless it will let them gain leverage over the people of Israel.  They have done nothing but fuel the anger the Palestinians have, instead of help it.  

After all the wars, attempted invasions and rocket attacks I know I would not ask Israel to give up any more land or make any more concessions.  This has all been tried before.  Presidents Carter and Clinton both held conferences with Arab and Jewish leaders, trying to broker a deal.  Both times Israel was forced to make concessions and we have seen how well that has worked out so far.

There are generations of people who have been raised to believe the Jewish people are their blood enemy.  They are brainwashed to the point where they will strap bombs to their women and children and send them to a crowded marketplace.  To make it worse, there are people of European descent, who still cling to the oldest and stupidest of stereotypes.  During the middle ages of Europe, the Pope decreed that all followers of Christ could not become bankers or handle large sums of money, as the profit would invoke sin.  This led the profession of bankers to be taken up by one of Europe’s minority groups: The Jews.  This ended up being a severe miscalculation, as it only caused jealously from those of the gentile persuasion.  This has lead to centuries of persecution and stereotypes still peddled by comics and presidents from oil rich nations today. 

Call me a skeptic, but I do not believe that a two state solution will change any of this.  President Obama is reportedly trying to get a two-state solution on the table from Israel by July.  As I have written before, I am glad that Benjamin Netanyahu was elected to the office of Prime Minister.  His country cannot afford mediocre or soft leadership at a time like this.

I have two hopes, at a time like this.  I hope that our government does not take advantage of this situation today at the DC museum.  Rahm Emanuel has said that one should never waste a ‘serious crisis’, and I can just see this being used as an excuse to crack down on other ‘right wing extremists.’  (As a right wing extremist, I’m offended to be compared to a scumbag like James Von Brunn)

I also hope that Israel and her people know that even if our president does not appear to stand with her, there are many of us who do. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Adventures of TOTUS and SCOTUS - Part 2

Well here we are for part two of The Adventures of TOTUS and SCOTUS!

Personally, I have a feeling Judge Sotomayor will be confirmed and added to the wonderful wide world of SCOTUS, the numbers in the congress of both democrats and limp-willed Republicans simply do not add up for a solid defeat.  I will however, point out one possibly bright side.  Judge Sotomayor has never come out and given her solid opinion on the issue of being pro-life or pro-choice.  She has either evaded the question, or never commented on it.  Her ruling history on it is mixed.  We know she was and is a devout catholic, and as such, being a catholic Hispanic, culturally that is a group very typically pro-life.  The one silver lining here is that she might possibly become a Souter or O'Connor, where they end up not voting as expected by those who appoint them.  If she came out and said she leaned even 51% to the pro-life side, her liberal street cred would be severely damaged, but she could wind up finding a few secret admirers from the right side of the isle.

On the other side of the news, TOTUS has been a severe disappointment as of lately.  He has not been throwing up any bloopers, and not been shutting off or moving his text along too quickly for Obama to follow.  I remembered all the wonderful speeches the president has given where he has said the wrong name, or spoken the wrong phrase, or gotten ahead of himself and asked his staff to 'back up' the teleprompter.  Maybe TOTUS is simply in a slump, but I'm praying he'll come around soon!  We certainly need the laughs, and right now Vice President Biden is all we have.  (Not as much comic relief as Bill Clinton, but he helps)

I hope it's all a big prank from TOTUS actually.  The bailouts,the pushing of a radical anti-religious and anti-capitalism agendas, not to mention the utter abandonment of everything that made this country such a great and unique experiment.  The biggest thing right now that is upsetting me, is Obama's foreign policy in regards to Israel.

There are generations of people in the Palestinian settlements, raised to hate the US and Israel.  Their children are the same as those who were holding up the victory sign on September 11th, 2001.  I know people who have lived in Israel, and people of Jewish heritage and faith who have visited it.  They all agree, that a two state solution will not work.

Obama recently said in his speech to the Muslim community that a two-state solution for Israel is a must.  Rumor also is that he asked Benjamin Netanyahu to procure a two-state solution by July at the latest.  I hope Netanyahu thoroughly disappoints the president.  Considering his entire campaign was based on no two state solution, I bet he will hold strong to his and many other peoples beliefs that Israel must remain whole, and the oppression of this state and it’s people, must finally end.   

Now if TOTUS tells us that he was pulling a big joke on us with Obama’s speech in Cairo, we could all have a chuckle and rest a bit easier.  Till next time!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »